Skip to content
Open access

Quality of AI-generated exercise awareness messages for older adults aligned with the ICFSR consensus: a comparative study of three LLMs.

Jul 2026 · European Review of Aging and Physical Activity · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

LLMs, particularly Claude, ChatGPT-4 and Deepseek demonstrate strong potential for generating accurate, safe, and hallucination-free exercise awareness messages for older adults, however, readability remains above recommended levels, requiring optimization.

Abstract

Background

Large Language Models (LLMs) are emerging as potential tools for health communication and patient education. However, their ability to translate complex medical guidelines into accessible, safe, and accurate messages for older adults remains insufficiently evaluated. To assess the capacity of ChatGPT-4, Claude AI, and Deepseek to generate exercise awareness messages for older adults, aligned with international expert consensus.

Materials And Methods

This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted between April and August 2025. Using the ICFSR 2021 Global Consensus on optimal exercise recommendations as the gold standard, we evaluated messages generated by three LLMs for 13 common chronic conditions in older adults. A standardized prompt was used to generate messages addressing exercise prescription considerations, disease progression, and recommended modalities. Two independent expert evaluators; a geriatrician and a sports medicine physician assessed five dimensions using a 5-point Likert scale; accuracy, clarity, safety, behavioral relevance, and absence of fabrication. Readability was measured using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). Inter-rater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Claude achieved the overall scores from both evaluators at 4.63 ± 0.55 and 4.60 ± 0.55, followed by ChatGPT-4 at 4.55 ± 0.50 and 4.48 ± 0.53 and Deepseek at 4.15 ± 0.87 and 4.17 ± 0.86. Inter-rater agreement was moderate was 0.668. Claude demonstrated accuracy scores at 4.58 ± 0.64, while ChatGPT-4 excelled in clarity with 5 ± 0. All models achieved perfect scores for absence of fabrication (5 ± 0). Readability indices revealed high complexity across all LLMs, with median FKGL values ranging from 10.84 to 10.93, corresponding to 10th-11th grade reading level, exceeding recommended levels for older populations. A significant correlation was found between Claude's accuracy scores and FKGL (r = 0.599, p = 0.030).

Conclusion

LLMs, particularly Claude, ChatGPT-4 and Deepseek demonstrate strong potential for generating accurate, safe, and hallucination-free exercise awareness messages for older adults. However, readability remains above recommended levels, requiring optimization.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Validation of an AI-powered mobile application for personalizing medical note explanations: a mixed-methods evaluation

This mixed-methods evaluation suggests that a deliberately constrained, language-focused AI system can improve the accessibility of medical notes while preserving clinical accuracy and safety while extending into clinical interpretation.

Nicholas Lamb · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Rethinking Pediatric Asthma Education Through Large Language Model Generation and Simplification: Randomized Double-Blind Study

Abstract Background Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate health education materials, yet questions remain about whether LLM-generated content can balance professional accuracy with public accessibility and what ethical challenges may arise during deployment. Objective This study aimed to evalu...

Tian-Yi Xu, Yong Yin, Xi Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Quality, readability, and patient safety of ChatGPT-generated responses to fall-related questions in older adults: a multidisciplinary evaluation

While ChatGPT provided generally acceptable clinical information, variability in readability and expert ratings raises patient safety concerns and AI-generated health content should be reviewed and tailored to older adults' health literacy needs before clinical use.

Merve Arı, N. Ilçin, Hatice Yağcıoğlu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

[Development of a Japanese version of the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) for clarifying the treatment goal priorities in older adults with multimorbidity].

OBJECTIVES In older adults with multimorbidity, clarifying the treatment goals is essential. The Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) is an internationally used four-item questionnaire (Independence, Staying alive, Pain relief, and Symptom relief). This study aimed to create a linguistically valid Japanese version of the...

Takuma Kimura, Saki Munakata, Hiroshi Nin et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Beyond the Black Box: A Point-Of-Care Framework for LLM Literacy and Critical Appraisal.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in primary care for documentation, patient communication, and clinical decision support. However, many clinicians are adopting these tools for patient care without structured training or a clear understanding of their limitations. LLM output may appear authoritative bu...

Christopher R. Stephenson, Christopher A. Aakre, I. Croghan et al. · 0 citations
#large language models Review Open access Sep 2026

Quality and safety of large language model–generated medication review outputs in geriatric pharmacotherapy: a two-stage comparative vignette-based benchmark evaluation

These findings support supervised use of large language models and evaluation approaches that assess reasoning and prioritisation as well as target detection and should not be interpreted as evidence that one model is clinically superior in real-world practice.

Kubra Cingar Alpay, D. Ozata, T. Gedik et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.