Generative artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for drug discovery, yet existing architectures typically operate in open loops without experimental feedback. Here we introduce rapid compound directed optimization (RCDO), a closed-loop reinforcement learning framework that accelerates the optimization process by bridging dry-lab computation with wet-lab feedback. RCDO couples a three-dimensional structure-guided generative model with a multi-level reward system updated after each design cycle using experimental measurements from all synthesized compounds, including inactive or developability-failed compounds. By continuously aligning the generative model with accumulated wet-lab measurements, RCDO substantially compresses optimization timelines. We evaluated RCDO through retrospective benchmarking against historical optimization trajectories and prospective wet-lab campaigns targeting ROR1, NLRP3, and NSD3. Across prospective evaluations, RCDO rapidly resolved key optimization bottlenecks within two to three design cycles: improving the oral exposure of an ROR1 inhibitor by 40-fold while maintaining antitumor efficacy, reducing CYP2C19 inhibition of an NLRP3 antagonist by 20-fold while preserving inflammasome activity, and boosting the binding affinity of an NSD3 hit by 18-fold. By directly coupling wet-lab feedback to generative learning, RCDO establishes an efficient platform for compound directed optimization, transforming AI-driven drug discovery from static generation into continuous experimental adaptation.
POLO (Preference-guided Optimization for Lead Optimization), a multi-turn Reinforcement Learning framework for sample-efficient lead optimization, which extracts learning signals from each trajectory at two complementary levels: trajectory-level policy optimization reinforces successful multi-turn strategies, while tur...
Ziqing Wang, Yibo Wen, William Pattie et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Comparisons with state-of-the-art methods demonstrate the enhanced performance of DFRL-Mol in multiple scenarios of molecule optimization, including SO optimization, substructure-constrained (SC) SO optimization, MO optimization, and MO molecule generation.
Zhen-Yi Wu, Peng-Cheng Zhao, Jia-Ning Li et al.· Briefings in Bioinformatics· 0 citations
Most computationally predicted materials are never synthesized because conventional synthesis optimization is slow, expertise-dependent, and iterative. Here we present a closed-loop framework that automates this expert workflow by placing human tacit knowledge in the loop through a large language model (LLM) that disti...
Fang Sheng, S. Torrisi, Amanda A. Volk et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces Elite-Weighted Supervised Fine-tuning (EW-SFT), which uses reward to guide elite selection of high-scoring molecules, and updates the model by its own pretraining loss on that set, and consistently outperforms the corresponding native optimizers.
Shiyun Wa, Yifei Wang, A. G. Green et al.· 0 citations
InfRL (Inference-time Reinforcement Learning) offers a practical and domain-agnostic approach to harness reinforcement learning during inference, bridging the gap between static prompting and computationally intensive parameter-level fine-tuning.
Sikun Guo, Amir Hassan Shariatmadari, Jiuqi Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
ESRL is introduced, an architecture-aware framework that explicitly explores the expert-routing space of MoE models, and preserves high-confidence experts as anchors, and restricts stochastic routing to a plausible candidate pool, thereby retaining reliable computation paths.
Hong-Yi He, Zheng-Wen Lin, Xiao Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.