The use of FI-lab in objectively quantifying frailty could be extended to peri-operative risk stratification for elderly colorectal cancer resection patients.
Abstract
Frailty in surgical patients is difficult to objectively quantify without bias. The FI-Lab is a laboratory-based frailty index derived from routine blood tests and physiological numerical variables only. Validated in medical cohorts, its role in predicting postoperative outcomes following colorectal cancer resection has not been well explored.
This retrospective cohort study included octogenarian patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection at a tertiary centre between 2011 and 2017. FI-Lab scores were calculated by summing variable-specific deficits and dividing by the total number of variables, generating a score from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater frailty. Patients were stratified into Low (≤0.20), Moderate (0.21–0.40), and High (>0.40) frailty groups. Postoperative mortality at 1, 2, and 5 years was analysed using univariable comparisons and logistic regression.
A total of 337 patients were included. The overall mean FI-Lab score was 0.241 (range 0.00–0.70). Patients who died within 1 year had significantly higher average FI-Lab scores than survivors (0.319 vs 0.233, p=0.007), with similar associations at 2 years (p=0.020) but not at 5 years. Mortality increased stepwise across frailty groups at 1 year (5.2%, 8.1%, 21.3%; p=0.003) and 5 years (34.2%, 31.1%, 51.1%; p=0.044). On logistic regression, High frailty was significantly associated with greater odds of 1-year (OR 4.62) 2-year (OR 2.34), and 5-year mortality (OR 2.08) compared to Low frailty (p<0.05).
The use of FI-lab in objectively quantifying frailty could be extended to peri-operative risk stratification for elderly colorectal cancer resection patients.
Combining frailty with an objective inflammation–nutrition risk composite modestly improved internal model performance for 30-day severe complications and 90-day readmission in older EC patients, and 1-year non-EC death analysis remains exploratory.
Because this retrospective study was limited by sample size, comorbidity-driven mFI-5 scoring, non-standardized delirium screening, and potential residual confounding, mFI-5 should be interpreted as a convenient screening marker rather than a stand-alone predictor.
K. Yamagata, S. Fukuzawa, Shohei Takaoka et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
Background and Objectives: Previous findings have suggested that inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers may help predict the prognosis in colorectal cancer patients; however, their predictive value and optimal use remain uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of several preoperatively measur...
A. Durhan, Yusuf Murat Bağ, M. Çaparlar et al.· Medicina· 0 citations
The findings suggest that the HALP score may serve as an adjunctive biomarker that could contribute to preoperative risk assessment in patients with colon cancer.
Çağan Aykurt, Ali Bal, Abdülkadir Ünsal et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
In this single-center retrospective cohort, the CRP/albumin ratio, fasting glucose, and surgery duration were independent predictors of postoperative infection in older adults with IFF.
Jin-Yang Li, Hong-Ming Yuan, Yan-Li Niu· Infection and Drug Resistanc...· 0 citations