This review describes the main characteristics and limitations of standard statistical approaches for GWAS, the main uses of AI methods in computational genomics, and recent attempts to leverage AI strategies in GWAS and presents 30 methods designed to leverage AI in GWAS.
Abstract
The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has generated increasingly large and complex genomic datasets, necessitating analytical approaches capable of capturing high-dimensional and potentially nonlinear genetic interactions. This situation has significantly impacted the entire field of Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), whose primary goal is the identification of genomic traits and variants that are statistically associated with the risk of a disease. However, traditional GWAS methods may show reduced performance when applied to highly polygenic and nonlinear genetic architectures. Computational strategies from Artificial Intelligence (AI) and, in particular, from machine- and deep-learning may provide a powerful tool to overcome such limitations, especially by capturing nonlinear interactions and complex hidden regularities in large-scale data, which traditional GWAS approaches might overlook. To date, only a few approaches have been introduced and systematically assessed. In this review, we describe the main characteristics and limitations of standard statistical approaches for GWAS, the main uses of AI methods in computational genomics, and recent attempts to leverage AI strategies in GWAS. Particular attention will be devoted to key issues, such as the interpretability of methods and results, and the curse of dimensionality. More specifically, the review presents 30 methods designed to leverage AI in GWAS, as well as presenting a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for their performance, also providing references to the most frequently used databases, and biobanks. Overall, this work may serve as a starting point for both dry- and wet-lab researchers, aiming to extract deeper insights from genomic data by moving beyond traditional linear additive assumptions, and leveraging large-scale datasets through AI-driven approaches.
The current challenges for using GWAS to prioritize variants for functional follow-up experiments are described and a multi-modal approach for resolving GWAS loci to a focused set of high-confidence variants for functional exploration is suggested.
Omar Y. Ahmed, Neha Saravanan, A. B. Rovsing et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have shown that pleiotropy, whereby a single genetic variant or gene influences multiple traits, is common in complex human diseases. Detecting cross‐phenotype associations from GWAS summary statistics remains challenging because of small effect sizes, extensive multiple testing, heterogeneous effects, and possible differences in effect direction across traits. Methods that jointly analyze multiple traits can improve the ability to detect pleiotropic signals while retaining the practical advantages of summary statistic‐based analyses. Although a range of statistical approaches has been developed for this purpose, practical guidance on their application, assumptions, and interpretation remains limited. This tutorial reviews several widely used methods for pleiotropy detection from GWAS summary statistics, including ASSET, PLACO, GPA, CPBayes, and GCPBayes, and demonstrates their application using breast and thyroid cancer datasets. We also highlight the importance of accounting for effect heterogeneity, correlation, and biological group structure at the gene and pathway levels in the detection and interpretation of pleiotropic association signals.
Christina Y. Feng, P. Sugier, Nan Zou et al.· Statistics in Medicine· 0 citations
A comprehensive overview of GS methodologies is provided, first covering the statistical foundations of linear mixed and Bayesian models, and then modern ML and DL approaches, to provide practical guidance for optimizing genomic evaluation strategies in the era of big data breeding.
Lifei Zhang, Mingzhu Zhang, Xinle Wang et al.· Journal of Animal Science an...· 0 citations
This work presents an empirical analysis of UQ in deep learning models, focusing on genomics applications, and shows that Bayesian Neural Networks are better at capturing uncertainty caused by strong class imbalance and out-of-distribution data in genomics, despite their computational disadvantages.
A clinically oriented, pipeline-based synthesis of contemporary AI applications in genomic medicine, focusing on factors that determine model robustness and clinical utility, and common sources of failure in real-world genomic AI systems.
Alexandra-Maria Blaga, Răzvan-Octavian Mihuț, A. Treteanu et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations