Skip to content
Review Open access

Exploring Large Language Model‐Based Intelligent Agents: Definitions, Methods, and Prospects

Jul 2026 · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · 1 citation · 62 references

TL;DR

An organizing framework for understanding LLM‐based agents is established, systematically deconstructing both single‐agent and multi‐agent systems into their core components, and the architectural principles and key mechanisms that underpin their intelligence are analyzed.

Abstract

The concept of the intelligent agent represents a long‐standing pursuit in artificial intelligence. Recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed a paradigm shift, enabling the development of sophisticated agents that exhibit advanced reasoning, planning, and tool‐use capabilities across diverse domains. These LLM‐based agents, which leverage natural language as a universal interface for cognition and interaction, are rapidly advancing from theoretical constructs to practical applications, ranging from autonomous task assistants to complex multi‐agent simulations of social and economic systems. This paper provides an integrative survey of this burgeoning field. We first establish an organizing framework for understanding LLM‐based agents, systematically deconstructing both single‐agent and multi‐agent systems into their core components. We analyze the architectural principles and key mechanisms that underpin their intelligence, including planning paradigms, memory structures, and reflection‐based self‐improvement. We further investigate the dynamics of multi‐agent systems, exploring coordination strategies, communication protocols, and organizational structures. The paper also covers the crucial aspects of performance evaluation, highlighting influential benchmarks and identifying key challenges. Finally, we synthesize the current landscape to discuss the primary challenges, such as the intrinsic limitations of LLMs and the complexities of ensuring safety and alignment, and chart a course for future research directions, including the drive toward continual learning and enhanced multi‐modal capabilities.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

From Language Models to Agentic AI: A Survey of Autonomous, Action-Enabled, and Collaborative LLM Agents

A unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance is presented.

Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Large Language Model Agents in Dynamic Mine Planning: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions

The analysis proposes an incremental maturity pathway, advancing from bounded advisory systems to fully integrated planning frameworks tailored to mining’s operational requirements, serving as a theoretically grounded framework to guide future empirical validation in mining.

Ricardo Nunes, Nathalie Risso, M. Momayez · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Language Model Council: A Multi-Agent Framework using Explainable AI

This work introduces the Language Model Council (LMC), a collaborative framework that combines the expertise of multiple specialized AI agents to evaluate a user query from different perspectives and outperforms traditional single-model systems by improving response quality, reducing hallucinations, and increasing user trust through enhanced explainability.

D. M, Shwetha Kr, G. Divya et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Exploring the Interplay of Theory of Mind, Logic Validation, and Advanced Retrieval in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

This study contributes to the field of artificial intelligence by offering a structured approach to building, testing, and refining multi-agent architectures that balance knowledge grounding, perspective modelling, and reasoning validation.

Adam Kostka, J. Chudziak · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Atomic to Agentic: Towards Interpretable Evaluation of LLMs'Agentic Mathematical Capabilities

Experiments reveal that models with similar end-to-end accuracy can exhibit markedly different agentic capability profiles, demonstrating that process-level evaluation is crucial for interpreting the true potential of LLMs and guiding the development of next-generation mathematical agents.

Jiayi Kuang, Yinghui Li, Yun-Ze Song et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Architectures, Learning Loops, and Emergence in Agentic Services Computing

Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are evolving from isolated task executors into interconnected societies of autonomous services capable of coordination, adaptation, and collective intelligence. This paper surveys and synthesizes recent advances in agentic services computing, LLM-based multiagent systems, and language-augmented reinforcement learning to analyze how feedback-driven learning loops enable emergent behaviors at system scale. We organize the design space along four dimensions: perception and context modeling, autonomous decision-making, multi-agent collaboration, and evaluation with alignment and trustworthiness. Building on this analysis, we propose a reference architecture for feedback-driven LLM-agent societies that integrates reinforcement learning, verbal feedback, episodic memory, coordination, and governance layers. We further define sociocognitive execution metrics for coordination density, goal agreement, role specialization, recovery, strategy diversity, throughput, behavioral variance, and failure tolerance, and illustrate their use through case studies and a localized ASC Micro-Testbed prototype. The prototype results show how critic feedback, episodic memory, and macro-level safety filtering support bounded recovery and constraint preservation. Finally, we identify open challenges, including cumulative learning without knowledge entropy, scalable coordination, trustworthy evolution, and standardized evaluation for reliable emergent agentic systems.

Sadaf Shafi, Michael Bidollahkhani, Julian M. Kunkel · 0 citations