Skip to content

Nested Convex-Body Chasing for Online Optimization with Evolving Feasible Sets

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 12 references
Computer Science

Abstract

We study online optimization with nested shrinking feasible regions in two settings: convex optimization with nested evolving feasible sets (CONES) and adversarial constrained online convex optimization (COCO). Our algorithms separate loss control from geometric movement: constrained minimizers and cumulative-loss tests preserve regret guarantees, while a deterministic resettable nested convex-body chaser limits movement. For CONES with a $G$-Lipschitz, $\mu$-strongly convex objective on a diameter-$D$ domain, we chase intersections of the current feasible set with adaptive objective sublevel sets. Using the Euclidean chasing ratio $O(\sqrt{d\log(1+d)})$, we obtain nonpositive regret at every prefix and movement $O(\sqrt{d\log(1+d)\,GD\log(eT)/\mu})$. The bound adapts to the increase in the constrained optimum value. In dimension two, with all other parameters fixed, every randomized algorithm with terminal expected regret $O(T^\beta)$, $\beta<1$, suffers $\Omega(\sqrt{\log T})$ expected movement on some deterministic nested sequence, proving optimal horizon dependence. Under linear growth away from the constrained minimizer set, Steiner-point tracking yields movement independent of $T$. For general convex COCO, one-step-delayed chasing with regularized-leader resets gives regret $O(G_fD\sqrt{d\log(1+d)T})$ and cumulative constraint violation $O(G_gD\sqrt{d\log(1+d)T})$. For strongly convex losses, both are $O(d\log(1+d)\log(eT))$ when other parameters are fixed. These reductions replace the $O(d^{d/2})$ projection-path factor in prior analyses by the polynomial dimension dependence of Euclidean nested convex-body chasing.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Convex Optimization with Nested Evolving Feasible Sets (CONES) under Time-Varying Loss Functions

Convex Optimization with Nested Evolving Feasible Sets (CONES)} was introduced in \cite{CONESVaze} where the objective function \(f\) remains fixed but the feasible region evolves over time as a nested sequence \(S_1 \supseteq S_2 \supseteq \cdots \supseteq S_T\). The goal of an online algorithm is to simultaneously mi...

Rahul Vaze · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

The First-Order Oracle Complexity of Lipschitz Convex Optimization in Nondual Settings

We study first-order black-box convex optimization over an $\ell_p$-ball for objectives Lipschitz in the $\ell_q$-norm, solving in the affirmative the nonsmooth version of the COLT open question (Guz15b) on whether the geometry of a smaller feasible set ($p<q$) can improve convergence rates in convex optimization, and...

David Martínez-Rubio, Brian Bullins, Cristóbal Guzmán et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Toward Optimal Regret in Adversarial MDPs with Stochastic Hard Constraints

We study episodic constrained Markov decision processes with adversarial losses under stochastic hard constraints. Specifically, starting from a known strictly feasible policy with margin $d$, we seek to obtain optimal regret while satisfying the expected cost constraints in every episode. In this setting, Stradi et al...

Qiang Zuo, F. Stradi · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Geometry-Dependent Bounds for Online Non-Monotone DR-Submodular Maximization

We study adversarial online maximization of nonnegative, non-monotone DR-submodular functions over compact convex down-closed sets. A learner commits each action before observing its objective and competes with the best fixed action in hindsight. We prove a comparator-uniform first-order inequality that gives coefficie...

Vaneet Aggarwal · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Gradient-Free Methods for Stochastic Convex Optimization with Stochastic Functional Constraints

We develop accelerated gradient-free methods for stochastic convex optimization with constraints defined by expectations. Our batched primal-dual sliding method uses two-point evaluations sharing a random sample and guarantees expected objective error and expected maximum constraint violation at most $\varepsilon$. It...

Vadim Abronin, A. Gasnikov, D. Dvinskikh · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Hugging Face Blog Oct 20, 2026

MPS in PyTorch 2.15

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.