MnIST-PRO is addressed, a benchmark that isolates agentic perception by converting MNIST digit recognition into a sequential, glimpse-based search task with lookback constraints, and ten multimodal models are evaluated, showing that simply acquiring visual evidence is not enough and agents must also be able to build and update a reliable perceptual state.
Abstract
AI agents in partially observable environments need to coordinate active sensing with working memory to maintain an evolving perceptual state. However, existing benchmarks struggle to isolate this perceptual-state construction and interpretation capability because they introduce physical and control complexities. We address this with MNIST-PRO, a benchmark that isolates agentic perception by converting MNIST digit recognition into a sequential, glimpse-based search task with lookback constraints. We evaluate ten multimodal models across four memory representations, including raw visual history, textual states, structured metric grid maps, and a consolidated visual canvas. While models excel under full observability, partial observability exposes a clear performance gap. We identify three distinct bottlenecks. First, perceptual-state construction and interpretation present a challenge, as agents struggle to integrate fragmented glimpses. Second, agents often stop exploring before they see the full sequence. Third, models often fail to revise early, incorrect beliefs even when faced with subsequent contradictory evidence. These results show that simply acquiring visual evidence is not enough. Agents must also be able to build and update a reliable perceptual state.
World models promise a general route to embodied intelligence: learn predictive dynamics once, then reason, plan, and act with them. Increasingly, the representations beneath such models are pretrained on large-scale video, interaction, and multimodal corpora, which raises a question prediction quality alone cannot ans...
Recent years have seen the employment of a plethora of machine learning (ML) models in high-stakes domains, but they remain largely opaque to the practitioners who act on their predictions. While post-hoc explanation methods offer a lens into this model behavior, wielding them effectively demands expertise most domain...
Large language model (LLM) agents can now undertake increasingly complex tasks, but the way they organize interaction history into memory does not ensure a coherent understanding of the current world. We introduce PoS, an inference-time framework that constructs and continually maintains explicit belief states as the a...
Yu Luo, Jia-Min Jiang, Yi-Min Zuo et al.· 1 citation
This work introduces RoboFollow, a diagnostic benchmark with three principles, which exposes genuine instruction following as a critical, overlooked bottleneck in embodied agents' ability to follow instructions.
Chang Guo, Yu-Kun Xie, Bo-Han Tan et al.· 0 citations
SmoLSTM couples a frozen 256M-parameter SmolVLM backbone to a matrix-memory LSTM control layer in which observation tokens and action queries are unified in a single causal stream that is never reset throughout the entire episode, capturing the episode in a recurrent state.
This paper shows that Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can internally distinguish when abstention is required, but fail to express it anyway, and introduces Penalized Epistemic Calibration Score (PECS), a new robust metric that requires models to both answer correctly when the outcome is knowable, and abstain when the out...
Fnu Pramono, J. Cai, Sourabh Kulkarni· 5 citations· ⚡1
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.