Locator-Critic (LOCI) is proposed, a training-free framework that decouples visual search from evidence verification and improves accuracy for both open-weight models like Qwen3-VL and proprietary models like Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) still struggle on tasks requiring complex visual understanding. We argue that the core issue is not high-level reasoning, but instead failing to locate critical details in the image. Due to this shortcoming, VLMs generate often plausible but incorrect reasoning based on flawed perceptual grounding. To address this, we propose Locator-Critic (LOCI), a training-free framework that decouples visual search from evidence verification. LOCI employs a Locator agent to propose candidate visual evidence and a separate Critic agent to evaluate its relevance and sufficiency. These agents engage in an iterative refinement loop, progressively improving the evidence until it is adequate to answer the given question. This decoupled, self-correcting process yields substantial performance gains, achieving state-of-the-art results on multiple complex visual benchmarks. LOCI improves accuracy for both open-weight models like Qwen3-VL (+12.1 on V*, +5.8 on HR-Bench and +11.2 on VisualProbe-Hard) and proprietary models like Gemini 2.5 Pro (+8.9 on V*, +4.3 on HR-Bench, +4.8 on VisualProbe-Hard).
Results show that process priors are most useful when aligned with the scene's specific decision boundary, motivating boundary-aware prior selection for process-grounded visual reasoning.
Yu-Yang Dai, Bo-Fei Huang, Hong-Bo Zhang et al.· 1 citation
GroundBench is introduced, a diagnostic benchmark that separates explanations through six branch-and-merge conditions, each adding a controlled information bundle, and a counterfactual re-ask targeting a real alternate part visible in the same image.
WM-VLM is introduced, which equips a pretrained VLM with a lightweight world model branch for generating intermediate visual states and suggests that internal world models offer a promising path toward VLMs that reason in both language and visual space.
Yuheng Zha, Yi-Lei Wang, Qiyue Gao et al.· 0 citations
This work compares six off-the-shelf VLMs against a transparent baseline that uses classical SIFT keypoint matching and a signal-quality index over retrieved images, and shows that a learned visual representation is not the bottleneck for this task: given retrieved images, a shape-appropriate classical similarity suffi...
SAVER (Selective Auditing of Verbal Evidence for Error Recovery), a lightweight, rule-based method that parses VLM responses for this evidence and triggers structured reprompting only when evidence is missing or inconsistent, significantly improves accuracy on tasks where errors stem from the model failing to articulat...
Overall, the results show that the baseline is fairly stable under lightweight prompt and decoding changes, however, these low-cost adjustments do not solve the model's main weakness, which still appears in spatial and compositional reasoning.
Zhong-Tian Liu· ITM Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.