ReactBench is introduced, a benchmark that reveals fundamental limitations in structural reasoning through chemical reaction diagrams and exposes a fundamental deficit in structural understanding and establishes directions for advancing visual reasoning.
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at recognizing individual visual elements and reasoning over simple linear diagrams. However, when faced with complex topological structures involving branching paths, converging flows, and cyclic dependencies, their reasoning capabilities degrade sharply, even on tasks as basic as counting endpoints. Existing benchmarks fail to probe this gap, focusing on semantic comprehension rather than structural reasoning. We introduce ReactBench, a benchmark that reveals fundamental limitations in structural reasoning through chemical reaction diagrams. These real-world scientific diagrams offer an ideal testbed because they naturally span diverse structures from linear chains to cyclic graphs, while requiring both precise local recognition and coherent global reasoning. Our benchmark comprises 1,618 expert-annotated QA pairs across four hierarchical task dimensions. Extensive evaluation across 24 MLLMs reveals a significant performance gap exceeding 30% between anchor-based tasks and holistic structural reasoning tasks. Controlled ablations confirm this bottleneck lies in reasoning, not perception. These findings expose a fundamental deficit in structural understanding and establish directions for advancing visual reasoning.
TSBench is introduced, a benchmark in which an LLM agent uses structure-editing tools to construct three-dimensional transition-state (TS) guesses verified by an automated quantum-chemical pipeline, yielding a physics-grounded pass/fail verdict, establishing a mechanism-level yardstick for LLM agents in mechanism-sensi...
RD-MCTS, a Monte Carlo Tree Search framework that incorporates diagram-derived structural priors, constraint-consistent state transitions, and inference-time step-level process rewards is proposed, aimed at improving constraint-consistent reasoning on high-difficulty questions.
Tianyu Hong, Peng Wang, Wenjun Ke et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Large language models rely heavily on human text, which often conveys surface answers rather than the spatial and structural logic behind them. Protein folding is a natural testbed, because one solved structure yields thousands of exactly checkable spatial and topological statements. We ask: can learning to fold protei...
Yong Liu, Zhan-Peng Shi, Yi-Zhou Dang et al.· 0 citations
A Neuro-Symbolic architecture that integrates a Logical Knowledge Graph (LKG) with dynamic solver routing, and introduces an ontology-based LKG that treats logical rules and constraints as first-class topological nodes, enabling explicit modeling of dependencies extracted from text.
Hai-Zhao Fan, Yu-Chi Xiong, Jize Wang et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces ChemDIRT (Diversified Instruction, Representation, and Task Benchmark), a comprehensive evaluation framework designed to assess the robustness of chemical reasoning in LLMs and benchmark a diverse set of open- and closed-source LLMs.
Eric Inae, Tim Gunn, Chris Bond et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes Visual Latent Structural Reasoning (VLSR), an end-to-end framework that jointly learns localization and reasoning from molecular images, and central to the approach is a localize-then-reason strategy.