Skip to content

VeriTrace: Evolving Mental Models for Deep Research Agents

May 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2605.26081 · 0 citations · 47 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

VeriTrace is a cognitive-graph framework that explicitly implements three regulatory loops: interpretive update, deviation feedback, and schema revision, and achieves the strongest reproducible open-source result on DRB.

Abstract

Deep research agents face vast, interdependent, and pervasively uncertain information. Existing systems explore what evolving intermediate representations should look like, but leave their evolution to the LLM's implicit reasoning. Without explicit regulation, the intermediate layer is easily contaminated by mixed-quality information, and errors propagate along its dependencies, so model scale often ends up substituting for absent regulation. We argue that an agent's mental model should instead evolve through explicit feedback that continuously aligns task understanding with reality, and identify three regulatory loops: interpretive update, deviation feedback, and schema revision. We realise this in VeriTrace, a cognitive-graph framework that explicitly implements the three loops. Using matched Qwen3.5-27B backbones, VeriTrace improves over the strongest matched baseline by an average of 4.82 pp on DeepResearch Bench (DRB) Insight (1.83 pp Overall) and by 5.9 pp Overall win rate on DeepConsult. With Config-DeepSeek, it achieves the strongest reproducible open-source result on DRB.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Sep 2026

Self-Reports Are Not Verification

An environment-grounded audit is introduced in which every intermediate proposal receives an exact outcome in an evolutionary Contexto search whose feedback function assigns every valid guess an exact rank without human annotation.

En-Rong Pan, Ryan Zhou, Ting Hu · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Do Agents Know When They Succeed? Calibrating Agent Confidence from Internal Representations

This paper investigates whether model's internal representations provide stronger signals of eventual task success in multi-turn agentic setups, and introduces two complementary methods: Latent Trajectory Dynamics (LTD) and the Action Representation Probe (ARP), which predicts success from representations formed at act...

Priyanka Mary Mammen, Emil Joswin, Srujananjali Medicherla · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Inertia to Objectivity: Improving Deep Research Agents with Noise Isolation

NIS-Agent is proposed, which applies context isolation at the two decision points most vulnerable to inertia bias: webpage triage and final-answer validation, and trains an 8B model to be intrinsically more resistant to inertia bias.

Xiang-Xin Zhang, Zhanwei Zhang, Zhihang Fu et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

MEA: A Reward-Driven Multi-Agent System for Faithful Model Explanations

Recent years have seen the employment of a plethora of machine learning (ML) models in high-stakes domains, but they remain largely opaque to the practitioners who act on their predictions. While post-hoc explanation methods offer a lens into this model behavior, wielding them effectively demands expertise most domain...

Yu-Yang Cheng, Raghav Kaushik Ravi, Srivarshinee Sridhar et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Beyond Memory: Harnessing Long-Horizon Agents with Explicit Belief States

Large language model (LLM) agents can now undertake increasingly complex tasks, but the way they organize interaction history into memory does not ensure a coherent understanding of the current world. We introduce PoS, an inference-time framework that constructs and continually maintains explicit belief states as the a...

Yu Luo, Jia-Min Jiang, Yi-Min Zuo et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Learning Counterfactual World Models for Embodied Reasoning under Partial Observability

This work introduces Counterfactual Latent World Models (CLWM), which combine a recurrent belief-state encoder, action-conditioned latent dynamics, and a contrastive counterfactual objective that separates futures induced by distinct interventions even when their observations look alike.

Todd Y. Zhou, Daniella Zhang · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Hugging Face Blog Oct 20, 2026

MPS in PyTorch 2.15

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.