REP, a lightweight in-context elicitation method that uses shadow-model-generated demonstrations wrapped in auxiliary code-like formats to raise user-visible reasoning traces from a victim model, substantially increases similarity between exposed and REP-conditioned internal traces while preserving useful reasoning signals.
Abstract
Reasoning traces have become a valuable form of learning signals for improving and transferring the capabilities of large language models. In particular, detailed traces can help distill reasoning behavior from stronger teacher models into weaker student models. The value of capability transfer has motivated many deployed systems with reasoning models to hide raw internal traces and expose at most summaries and answers to users. As a result, we ask whether such interface-level trace hiding prevents users from obtaining useful reasoning supervision through prompting. We study this question with Reasoning Exposure Prompting (REP), a lightweight in-context elicitation method that uses shadow-model-generated demonstrations wrapped in auxiliary code-like formats to raise user-visible reasoning traces from a victim model. Across the common reasoning dataset, different victim models, and different student model distillation, REP substantially increases similarity between exposed and REP-conditioned internal traces while preserving useful reasoning signals.
HSRM is introduced, a lightweight hidden-state reward model that verifies candidate solutions by directly reading the generator's internal representations rather than re-processing its text, providing an efficient alternative to text-only verification by reusing representations already computed during generation.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated striking capabilities on frontier mathematical problems, it remains unclear whether they possess the structural mathematical understanding underlying their solutions. In this paper, we take a first step toward systematically studying mathematical understanding in LLM...
Shuo Xing, Zi-Lin Dai, Cheng-Yuan Qian et al.· 0 citations
It is found that full trajectories provide only limited benefit, while partial trajectories are effective even under heavy truncation, and training LLMs using endpoints leads to consistent changes in reasoning behavior, and that it also benefits post-training methods based on reinforcement learning or on-policy distill...
Jaehui Hwang, Sangdoo Yun, Byeongho Heo et al.· 0 citations
This work conducts a controlled human study of six reasoning formats across tasks of varying complexity, supported by a web-based framework that randomizes task domains, problem instances, and representation order.
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can substantially improve the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), but it often comes with high inference cost due to long and poorly controlled reasoning traces. This overhead is particularly problematic in software engineering tasks (e.g., code generation), where both la...
Ke-Rui Huang, Shu-Han Liu, Xing Hu et al.· Proceedings of the ACM on So...· 0 citations
FlyBy is introduced, a selective querying framework, and 4B and 8B variants are trained to reason first, diagnose what remains unresolved, and, at a knowledge bottleneck, query stronger models whose parametric knowledge extends beyond its own.
Chanuk Lee, Minki Kang, Sangwoo Park et al.· 0 citations