Skip to content

Towards Accurate and Lightweight Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumor Diagnosis via Contrastive Multi-scale Pathological Image Analysis

Zhu Zhu Shuo Jiang Jingyuan Zheng Yawen Li Yifei Chen Manli Zhao Weizhong Gu Feiwei Qin Jinhu Wang Gang Yu
Sep 2026
Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision

Abstract

Peripheral neuroblastic tumors (pNTs) are among the most common extracranial solid tumors in children, and accurate pathological subtyping is important for risk stratification and treatment planning. However, pNT subtyping on hematoxylin-eosin whole-slide images (WSIs) remains challenging because of limited pediatric tumor cohorts, marked histological heterogeneity, inter-observer variability, and the computational burden of existing WSI classifiers. To address these challenges, we propose CoPath, a framework consisting of CoHisNet and PathVote. CoHisNet is a lightweight multi-scale feature-fusion network for patch-level histopathological classification. By replacing the multilayer perceptron components in Swin Transformer blocks and the classification head with Kolmogorov-Arnold Network layers, CoHisNet improves nonlinear feature modeling under a compact architecture. Its multi-scale interaction and contrast-driven feature-enhancement design enables the model to capture both tissue-level structures and fine-grained cellular morphology. PathVote further incorporates pathology-informed tissue-component priors to aggregate patch-level predictions into WSI-level decisions. We validated CoPath on a private two-branch PpNTs cohort and the public BreakHis breast cancer histopathology dataset. Experimental results show that CoPath achieves competitive or superior performance compared with general image classifiers, pathology foundation models under linear probing, and pathology-specific classification models, while maintaining substantially lower computational complexity. The source code is available at https://github.com/JSLiam94/CoPath.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

Agile - denoting "the quality of being agile, readiness for motion, nimbleness, activity, dexterity in motion" - software development methods are attempting to offer an answer to the eager business community asking for lighter weight along with faster and nimbler software development processes. This is especially the case with the rapidly growing and volatile Internet software industry as well as for the emerging mobile application environment. The new agile methods have evoked substantial amount of literature and debates. However, academic research on the subject is still scarce, as most of existing publications are written by practitioners or consultants. The aim of this publication is to begin filling this gap by systematically reviewing the existing literature on agile software development methodologies. This publication has three purposes. First, it proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches. Second, it analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion. Third, it compares these methods and highlights their similarities and differences. Based on this analysis, future research needs are identified and discussed.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 728 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

Context: Software startups are newly created companies with no operating history and fast in producing cutting-edge technologies. These companies develop software under highly uncertain conditions, tackling fast-growing markets under severe lack of resources. Therefore, software startups present a unique combination of characteristics which pose several challenges to software development activities. Objective: This study aims to structure and analyze the literature on software development in startup companies, determining thereby the potential for technology transfer and identifying software development work practices reported by practitioners and researchers. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping study, developing a classification schema, ranking the selected primary studies according their rigor and relevance, and analyzing reported software development work practices in startups. Results: A total of 43 primary studies were identified and mapped, synthesizing the available evidence on software development in startups. Only 16 studies are entirely dedicated to software development in startups, of which 10 result in a weak contribution (advice and implications (6); lesson learned (3); tool (1)). Nineteen studies focus on managerial and organizational factors. Moreover, only 9 studies exhibit high scientific rigor and relevance. From the reviewed primary studies, 213 software engineering work practices were extracted, categorized and analyzed. Conclusion: This mapping study provides the first systematic exploration of the state-of-art on software startup research. The existing body of knowledge is limited to a few high quality studies. Furthermore, the results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts