This White Paper written by the Global Lymphoma Registry Alliance (LyRA) discusses the importance and value of lymphoma registries for different stakeholders as well as benefits of forming a global alliance of the registry network.
Abstract
Lymphomas comprise a complex and heterogeneous group of malignancies which pose challenges in understanding their epidemiology, pathobiology, treatment responses and long-term outcomes. Evolving diagnostic classification and fast-paced therapy development compound these challenges. Robust real-world data (RWD) collection and analysis using clinical registries can contribute significantly to address gaps in understanding of practice variation and provide evidence for health technology assessments. However, to maximize the impact of lymphoma registries, and those in other diseases, there is a compelling need for global collaboration, data harmonization and automated integration between registries and other large datasets. Technologies that enable safer data sharing are already available, but historical legal frameworks and evolving privacy concerns are not keeping pace, undermining their intended purpose and limiting the full potential of available high-quality RWD to improve patient care. This White Paper written by the Global Lymphoma Registry Alliance (LyRA) discusses the importance and value of lymphoma registries for different stakeholders as well as benefits of forming a global alliance of the registry network. An alliance such as LyRA serves both academic endeavors and public interest through collaboration between patient and community organizations, policy-makers, regulatory authorities, industry and others seeking to use RWD. Bringing these stakeholders together and raising awareness more broadly will facilitate timely clinical trial result contextualization and innovation in public-private collaborations on novel trial emulations and designs, including external comparator cohorts. The LyRA leadership propose strategies for overcoming barriers to facilitate these key collaborations towards improving patient outcomes on a global scale.
The GENIE Data Model (GDM), a comprehensive, open-source, oncology data model for scalable, consistent, and interoperable data collection across solid tumors designed to effectively capture the patient's journey with cancer, is developed.
J. Hoppe, Jocelyn Lee, T. Akinyemiju et al.· Cancer Research Communicatio...· 0 citations
A reusable pipeline to convert the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes Consortium for Real World Evidence (LEO CReWE) registry into Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC)-compliant data sets is developed by constructing a generalized, registry-wide Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) and deriving analysis-...
Michael J. Kane, D. Chihara, Amy A. Ayers et al.· JCO Clinical Cancer Informat...· 0 citations
Background Portugal’s population-based cancer registries have evolved from fragmented municipal initiatives, starting in 1976, to full national coverage by 2007, culminating in the legislative creation of the National Cancer Registry [Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON)] in 2017. Patients and methods This short communica...
T. Garcia, A. Sousa, P. Leite-Silva et al.· ESMO real world data and dig...· 0 citations
The selection of biomarker-specific patient populations is essential in targeted cancer therapies to enhance precision and efficacy. To ensure a successful launch, it is vital to promote awareness and adoption of biomarker testing at diagnosis, tailor implementation strategies to accommodate local variations, and ensur...
Dai Feng, Amber Lind, Weili He· Journal of Biopharmaceutical...· 0 citations
A narrative review of emerging cancer treatment data, molecular profiling technologies, and existing clinicogenomic databases, focusing on how tumors are characterized, how subgroups are defined, and how demographic, lifestyle, and environmental factors are captured.
Farhood Farahnak, W. El-Deiry, Yves A. Lussier et al.· JCO Global Oncology· 0 citations
The integration of genetic ancestry and germline susceptibility data is clarifying ancestry-related differences in leukemia biology and outcomes, while confirming risk loci with population-specific effects.
Ana M. Mora, J. Mejía-Aranguré, J. Dockerty et al.· Cancer Epidemiology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.