This work introduces TAKE 85, the first benchmark for directorial-intent understanding, comprising 398 short films with expert-verified question-answer pairs spanning global and fine-grained visual and audio intent, and establishes directorial intent as a previously overlooked dimension of multimodal understanding.
Abstract
Films communicate through deliberate creative choices, including lighting, color, composition, editing, dialogue, music, and sound. Humans naturally interpret these signals as directorial intent, yet current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are evaluated almost exclusively on understanding what happens rather than why it is presented that way. We introduce TAKE 85, the first benchmark for directorial-intent understanding, comprising 398 short films (85 hours) with expert-verified question-answer pairs spanning global and fine-grained visual and audio intent. Through controlled modality ablations, TAKE 85 enables systematic evaluation of multimodal reasoning. Experiments on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal a substantial gap between perceptual recognition and intentional understanding: while models accurately describe events and narratives, they consistently fail to infer the communicative role of filmmaking decisions. Our results establish directorial intent as a previously overlooked dimension of multimodal understanding: even the strongest model reaches only 58 out of 100, and our ablations show that no input modality is sufficient on its own. All code, Q&As, and models are publicly available from https://github.com/KaiShinozakiConefrey/Take-85
CinematicVQA is introduced, the first-of-its-kind benchmark for cinematic video understanding that goes beyond technique recognition to evaluate film-grammar reasoning, utilizing the introduced Cinematic Scene Graph (CSG), a structured representation that links filming techniques to their perceptual effects and narrati...
Shuo Xing, Pooja Verlani, Balu Adsumilli et al.· 0 citations
A scalable framework that identifies text-biased surface interpretations and converts disagreement regions into conflict QA examples and develops an agentic-style reasoning framework that converts speech into an Audio Twin, a text-readable representation of localized acoustic cues that exposes acoustic evidence to the...
Yen-Ju Lu, Yu-Zhe Wang, Yao-Han Guan et al.· 1 citation
Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.
Hear2Act is introduced, a unified evaluation protocol for text and spoken assistants with 480 persona-grounded scenarios, hidden user concerns, and objectively verifiable outcomes that show that prosody matters when lexical evidence is insufficient, and that audio-capable LLMs can recover information from speech but do...
Xin-Yi Liu, H. Nayyeri, Dilek Hakkani-Tur et al.· 3 citations· ⚡1
NARU, a benchmark designed to evaluate Narrative evolution and Reasoning on cultural Understanding in Japanese long-form video, is introduced, a hierarchical memory-based annotation pipeline that transforms raw video into structured event, narrative, and cultural annotations, then generates questions via task-oriented...
Yu-Heng Huang, Jian-Lang Chen, Jia-Yang Song et al.· 0 citations
Sarcasm detection is addressed through sarcasm detection, evaluating Qwen2.5-Omni and Qwen3-Omni on Mandarin Chinese and English under five modality conditions that decompose the contributions of lexical content, vocal semantics, and prosodic structure to reveal a shared stereotype of expressive prosody.
Yong-Jian Chen, Pengfei Wei, Yiqun Sun et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.