Skip to content
Review Open access

Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey

Jul 2026 · Journal of Imaging · Vol 12 · 0 citations · 158 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A comprehensive survey of UQ techniques in medical image segmentation is presented, categorizing existing approaches into Bayesian methods, deep ensembles, deterministic methods, test-time data augmentation, and hybrid models, while treating foundation-model-based UQ as a separate cross-cutting category.

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in medical image segmentation is essential for ensuring the reliability and interpretability of deep learning models in clinical decision-making. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer-based architectures have achieved remarkable segmentation performance, they often provide deterministic outputs without accounting for uncertainty, which can lead to overconfident predictions in ambiguous cases. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of UQ techniques in medical image segmentation, categorizing existing approaches into Bayesian methods, deep ensembles, deterministic methods, test-time data augmentation, and hybrid models, while treating foundation-model-based UQ as a separate cross-cutting category. We examine key methodologies, including Monte Carlo dropout, Bayesian neural networks, variational inference, and ensemble learning, discussing their advantages and limitations in addressing aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Additionally, we explore the clinical relevance of UQ by reviewing its applications in brain tumor segmentation, cardiac imaging, lung nodule detection, and other medical domains. The paper also highlights key evaluation metrics, such as calibration errors, uncertainty–error correlation, and visual interpretability, to assess the effectiveness of UQ methods. Finally, we discuss challenges and future research directions, emphasizing the need for scalable, interpretable, and clinically actionable uncertainty quantification strategies to improve trust in AI-assisted medical image analysis.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Exploring the Connection between Uncertainty and Tissue Boundaries in Medical Image Segmentation.

An Evidential Uncertainty-Guided Boundary (EUGB) loss is proposed to demonstrate that uncertainty information can indeed facilitate combating boundary segmentation errors, and empirical insights for selecting appropriate loss functions across different application scenarios are provided.

Na Zeng, Qiao Lin, Xingyue Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Medical image segmentation with optimal learning from limited data and annotations: A comprehensive review

This survey extends beyond traditional and deep learning-based augmentation techniques or deep semi-supervised approaches, by explicitly focusing on medical/clinical imaging modalities, by explicitly focusing on CT, MRI, and X-ray, offering a broader perspective.

Pratiksha Gawas, Sowmya Kamath S. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation via Perturbation-Aware Mutual Learning and Edge-Aware Uncertainty Loss for Accurate Anatomical Delineation.

This paper proposes a novel framework that effectively leverages unlabeled data to improve segmentation performance in cardiac structures and applies a novel consistency constraint by a dual fine-grained boundary loss that provide global characteristics-based guidance from the transition of the boundary region and an edge-aware uncertainty loss.

Waqas Anwaar, Van Manh, Wufeng Xue et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Uncertainty-guided mamba network for efficient medical image segmentation with evidential deep learning.

This work proposes an uncertainty-aware efficient segmentation framework synergizing Mamba state-space models with evidential deep learning, employing a 2D-adapted selective state-space mechanism to capture long-range dependencies with linear complexity O(L), overcoming transformers' quadratic scaling.

Siqin Sun, Chihui Long, Xingbo Dong et al. · 0 citations