Adapted XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 outcomes among immunocompromised persons in 2023-24 in six European countries: a VEBIS-EHR network study.
Jul 2026· Expert Review of Vaccines· Vol 25 1, pp.
2708184
· 0 citations· 26 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Adapted XBB.1.1.5 vaccine provided moderate protection within 120 days after vaccination against severe COVID-19 outcomes among ICPs aged ≥18 years during a period with BA.2.1 replacing the XBB.1.5 variant.
Abstract
Background
We estimated the XBB.1.5 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 hospitalization and death in Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Portugal, Spain (Navarre), and Sweden following the 2023-24 fall vaccination campaign among immunocompromised persons (ICPs).
RESEARCH
Design
AND
Methods
We conducted a multi-country retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Study sites identified ICPs aged ≥18 years through a common set of immunocompromising conditions and follow-up started the first day of the 2023 vaccination campaign until 12 months later. VE was calculated by time since vaccination (14-59, 60-119, 120-179, 180-365 days after vaccination) for ICPs by pooling study site level confounder adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of vaccination, estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression models, using a random effect meta-analysis with VE = 100 × (1-pooled aHR).
Results
The XBB.1.5 VE was 52% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41 to 60) and 75% (95%CI: 60 to 84) against hospitalization and death, respectively, 14-59 days after vaccination, and VE decreased with time since vaccination with no remaining protection at 180-365 days after vaccination.
Conclusion
Adapted XBB.1.5 vaccine provided moderate protection within 120 days after vaccination against severe COVID-19 outcomes among ICPs aged ≥18 years during a period with BA.2.86/JN.1 replacing the XBB.1.5 variant.
BNT162b2 provided protection against COVID-19-associated outcomes of ED, UC or hospitalization among non-immunocompromised U.S. adults, including those with UMCs, over the course of the 2024-2025 respiratory virus season, supporting continued vaccine recommendations.
Tara Ahi, K. Andersen, J. Mateus et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
Objectives: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in reducing all-cause, pneumonia-related, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related mortality in adults aged ≥60 years. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study using existing health surv...
Yan Kang, Zhi-Wei Zheng, Juan Qi et al.· Vaccines· 0 citations
Background: Immunocompromised patients are at heightened risk for severe COVID-19 and its complications. While vaccination is critical for this population, long-term adherence and the durability of vaccine-induced immunity remain significant public health concerns. This study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal serologi...
A. Sarcone, Maria Rosaria Deodato, A. De Pasquale et al.· Vaccines· 0 citations
It was found that, during a 5-month study period with low incidence, JN.1-vaccination provided limited added protection in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Anne J. Huiberts, D. Eggink, B. de Gier et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
In this population-based cohort, completion of the 3-dose BNT162b2 primary series was associated with substantially lower rates of COVID-19-attributed SARI among children aged 6 months to 4 years.
I. N. Schrarstzhaupt, F. A. Diaz-Quijano· Vaccine· 0 citations
A pronounced HVE was observed for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during the pandemic, evidenced by markedly lower mortality from causes not plausibly related to vaccination (cancer, external causes) among vaccinated individuals.
U. Riedmann, H. Brenner, J. Ioannidis et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.