Skip to content
Preprint

Positive-Incentive Noise Predictor for Adversarial Purification in Speaker Verification

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 49 references
Engineering

TL;DR

The Positive-Incentive Noise Predictor (PnP) is proposed, the first framework that explicitly introduces positive-incentive noise ({\pi}-noise) into the purification task and effectively defends against adversarial attacks while preserving performance on natural speech.

Abstract

Modern automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations. Diffusion-based purification has recently shown strong effectiveness against such perturbations, but its reverse denoising process requires iterative sampling and leads to high inference latency. We find that the forward noising process provides most of the robustness gain. Motivated by this observation, we reformulate adversarial purification as a learnable noising problem, and propose the Positive-Incentive Noise Predictor (PnP), the first framework that explicitly introduces positive-incentive noise ({\pi}-noise) into the purification task. PnP learns input-adaptive {\pi}-noise and mixes it with the input to improve the robustness of downstream ASV systems. Experiments on four advanced ASV backbones show that PnP effectively defends against adversarial attacks while preserving performance on natural speech. Compared with representative purification baselines, the proposed framework provides a competitive balance among defense effectiveness, impact on genuine utterances, and inference efficiency under white-box, black-box, and defender-aware adaptive attacks, with a real-time factor as low as 0.014. Moreover, PnP can be cascaded with a diffusion denoiser to further improve the perceptual quality of purified utterances. Code and purified audio examples are available at https://eurecom-asp.github.io/pnp/

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Jul 2026

AMRM-Pure: Semantic-Preserving Adversarial Purification

This work proposes AMRM-Pure, a purification framework that denoises adversarial inputs by preserving patch-level semantics, and formulate this process as a tractable optimization problem with respect to the input.

Zhihao Dou, Zhiqiang Gao, Dongfei Cui et al. · 0 citations

Parameter-Efficient Dual-Loss Adaptation with Logit Divergence: A Unified Approach for Adversarial Example Detection and Robust Inference

D3Adapter is presented, a threat-aware framework that unifies adversarial example detection (AED) and robust inference and scalability across datasets with varying numbers of classes is studied, showing that unified detection and robust inference can be achieved with predictable overhead proportional to the number of adapters.

Zirui Fu, Marco Donato · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Adversarial Purification by Consistency-aware Latent Space Optimization on Data Manifolds.

This paper reveals that samples generated by a well-trained generative model are close to clean ones but far from adversarial ones, and proposes Consistency Model-based Adversarial Purification (CMAP), which optimizes vectors within the latent space of a pre-trained consistency model to generate samples for restoring clean data.

Shuhai Zhang, Jiahao Yang, Hui Luo et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Enhancing robustness of deep learning-based malware detection against adversarial attacks

This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhance robustness against evolving adversarial threats.

Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

CAFAD: common acoustic features for adversarial audio detection

CAFAD is proposed, a plug-and-play detection framework that combines multi-domain acoustic feature fusion and temporal pyramid matching for variable-length adversarial audio detection that achieves an average detection accuracy of 99.25%, with a false positive rate of 1.00% on benign samples.

Wenjie Li, Pengyu Wei, Xuejing Yuan et al. · 0 citations