Skip to content

A Composable Evaluation System for Reproducible Omni-Modal Foundation Model Evaluation

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 29 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

OmniEvaluator connects existing inference engines and curated evaluation libraries at a higher level, exposing four inference backends, four evaluation frameworks, and over a thousand benchmarks through a single interface.

Abstract

Building an omni-modal foundation model means evaluating it across text, image, video, and audio. Excellent evaluation toolkits exist for each modality, but their inference engines, prompt conventions, and metric implementations are mutually incompatible, so practitioners end up maintaining separate environments for every toolchain and still struggle to compare results across them. OmniEvaluator grew out of this need in our own model development: rather than reimplementing benchmarks, it connects existing inference engines and curated evaluation libraries at a higher level, exposing four inference backends, four evaluation frameworks, and over a thousand benchmarks through a single interface. Every run is recorded as an artifact capturing the full configuration for exact reproduction, and results flow into a shared dashboard for cross-model comparison. A federated mode shares GPU inference servers across concurrent evaluations, and a built-in verifier, small enough to run on CPU, keeps its score stable across engines and prompts where rule-based scoring fluctuates under configuration mismatch, matching cost-efficient commercial LLM judges without their recurring API cost. The system, demo video, and dashboard are publicly available. (https://github.com/naver-ai/omni-evaluator)

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

DAREBench: Deployment-Aware and Reliable Evaluation of Models as Agents

DAREBench (Deployment-Aware and Reliable Evaluation of Models as Agents), a benchmark designed to capture workload variation and support reliable agent evaluation, is introduced, suggesting that agent deployment and model selection should consider workload profiles, deployment mode, and accuracy--cost trade-offs rather...

Yu Liu, Zhi-Lin Liu, Zhi-Wei Yang et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

UCT: A Versatile Code Translation Framework Based on a Unified Intermediate Representation

Model-driven design often requires the same model to support multiple downstream tasks, such as simulation, testing, verification, and deployment. However, existing tools usually build separate translation workflows for different tasks, causing repeated model parsing, redundant semantic reconstruction, and limited reus...

Wang-Cai Li, Dong-Yan Wang, Ze-Hong Yu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

SURE-EVAL: A Systematic and Unified Agentic Framework for Reproducible Evaluation

Audio and speech models are released rapidly, but reported scores often conflate model capability with deployment and evaluation choices. The same checkpoint can produce different predictions under different runtimes, hardware, decoding settings, or fallback policies. Even fixed predictions can receive different scores...

Jing Peng, Jun Du, Yi-Xuan Wang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Evaluating the Efficiency of Open-Source AI Chat Models in Local Deployments

This study evaluates the performance and operational practicality of locally deployed large language models (LLMs) as organizations seek cost-efficient, privacy-preserving alternatives to cloud AI. The objective is to generate workflow-aware evidence that supports informed model selection for automation use cases. Four...

Ida Bagus Kerthyayana Manuaba, Juwono · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.