Skip to content

Workload Identification with Physical Side Channels for AI Governance

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 21 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is shown that an external observer can identify the class of the workload running on an NVIDIA H200 from its power draw, and adversarial traces are recorded, offering initial insights beyond genuine activities and a dataset for developing and testing stronger evasion mechanisms.

Abstract

AI compute verification is one of the first tangible and tractable points for international policy aimed at AI governance. Determining whether frontier labs, or any operator, comply with agreements requires the regulating authority to discern how their compute is used. The elementary building block of AI compute is the GPU, and any activity it executes leaves a physical trace. Here, we show that an external observer can identify the class of the workload running on an NVIDIA H200 from its power draw. Unlike on-chip NVML telemetry, which can be spoofed or replayed, such a physical channel can in principle be observed independently of operator cooperation. We recorded $930$ five-second traces at $\sim 10$ MHz, covering seventeen open LLM families and twenty-five non-AI workloads. Over this corpus we separate training from inference and from non-AI computation with an accuracy of $97\%$ and a macro-averaged F1 score of $0.955$, evaluated on model families unseen during training. AI workload spectral content predominantly lies below $\sim 20$kHz and training is particularly recognizable through the memory-bound optimizer update. The GPU operator is then treated as adversarial and able to reshape the physical computation itself. Four evasion strategies are tested to disguise training as inference, producing an additional 680 adversarial traces. A detector hardened against evasion strategies, with the tested strategy held out, catches training $\geq 99\%$ of the time for three of the four strategies. The fourth, diluted low-rank adaptation (LoRA), is detected $48$--$88\%$ of the time with a hardened classifier, rising to $\geq 98\%$ with an additional rescue rule. While these attacks are not a comprehensive evaluation against adversarial behaviour, they offer initial insights beyond genuine activities and a dataset for developing and testing stronger evasion mechanisms.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

TokenPowerSandbox: Evidence-Gated CPU-First Screening for Energy-Aware LLM Serving

Energy-aware LLM serving requires comparing configurations under realistic request shapes, yet exhaustive target-GPU profiling is costly and a cheap predictor can be dangerously confident outside its measured scope. We present TokenPowerSandbox, an evidence-gated workflow that combines an interpretable CPU-resident pro...

Chenxu Niu · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

AI with Authority, from Application to Silicon

Generative AI inverts this relationship: at AI speed, machine verification is not only economical but essential to productivity --- it is the incorruptible referee that lets one person safely direct autonomous machine work at scale.

Jason Hickey · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Weird Machines in Transport Layer Security

It is shown that legitimate TLS primitives, including session cache entries, renegotiation logic, extension parsing, and certificate verification steps, compose into Turing-complete systems whose computation is coupled to authentication and trust decisions rather than physical actuation.

Michael Collins, J. Cumberland, Brianne Dunn et al. · 0 citations

Future Generation Computer

Lorenzo Brescia, Iacopo Colonnelli, Robert Birke et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Trigger the Straggler: Load Hijack on Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

Expert parallelism (EP) is a common strategy for serving large Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models across multiple GPUs by distributing experts among devices. Router decisions then determine both which experts process each token and which GPUs execute the resulting work. This procedure exposes a supply-chain attack surface...

Rui Zhang, Wenbo Jiang, Hong-Wei Li et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Sep 2026

Redefining Trust at the Memory Wall: The Threat Landscape, an Adversary Model and a Conceptual Framework for Secure Processing-in-Memory

A structured threat model is developed that characterizes assets, attacker capabilities, and trust boundaries at subarrays and interconnect granularity for both near-bank and near-memory PIM classes, and proposes a conceptual secure-by-design framework that locates trust enforcement within the memory substrate itself,...

Sayali Waingankar, Hung T. Q. Le, D. Benhaddou · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.