A scribble-conditioned residual encoder U-Net operating on four input channels: CT, PET, and a sparse scribble map for each of foreground and background, which removes tracer- and centre-specific scaling without requiring lesion labels in whole-body PET/CT segmentation.
Abstract
Automated lesion segmentation in whole-body PET/CT is complicated by the variety of physiological tracer uptake patterns and by the differing appearance of lesions across tracers. The autoPET/CT V challenge addresses this by making segmentation interactive: user scribbles marking foreground and background are supplied alongside the image, and the algorithm is expected to exploit them. We present our submission, a scribble-conditioned residual encoder U-Net operating on four input channels: CT, PET, and a sparse scribble map for each of foreground and background. The network is initialised from the autoPET-III winning weights and extended from two to four input channels, with the two scribble channels zero-initialised so that the pretrained representation is preserved exactly at initialisation. Every model is fine-tuned per fold from the corresponding autoPET-III fold checkpoint, so that no validation case is seen during pretraining. PET intensities are normalised against a per-scan aorta blood-pool reference derived from a CT segmentation, which removes tracer- and centre-specific scaling without requiring lesion labels. At inference the five fold models are ensembled by averaging their softmax outputs per sliding-window patch, before Gaussian-weighted stitching. On the challenge's five-fold split, with each fold evaluated on its own validation cases, mean Dice is 0.554 and mean lesion-level F1 is 0.528 without scribbles, rising to 0.751 and 0.733 after five correction rounds. About 85% of that gain follows the first scribble, and the spread between fold models narrows five-fold over the same rounds, so interaction largely compensates for how well or badly a given model segments unaided.
TRIAGE, Tracer-aware Refinement via Interactive Anatomy-Guided sEgmentation, a 3D STU-Net initialized through masked autoencoding pre-training with an asynchronous masking strategy, aiming to learn transferable anatomical and cross-modal representations before task-specific fine-tuning.
Xing-Long Liang, Chun-Fang Lu, Tian-Yu Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Across four-fold cross-validation the organ-supervised model achieves the best and most stable performance, the interactive stage improves the Dice score monotonically with each prompt, and PSMA-specific training yields the strongest tracer-wise results.
Pablo Lozano-Jimenez, Sergio Romero-Tapiador, Ruben Tolosana· 0 citations
Dense vessel annotation in digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is labor-intensive, yet every unlabeled sequence records how contrast passes through the vessels. Semi-supervised methods take their targets from the current model, and generic self-supervised pretexts reconstruct static appearance, so this signal goes un...
Xin-Ge Guo, Yuan-Hao Wang, Liao Shu et al.· 0 citations
InstEditSeg is proposed, a unified generative framework that reformulates medical segmentation as an instruction-driven image editing problem, and achieves accuracy competitive with strong discriminative baselines, and demonstrates concrete advantages of the generative formulation.
Segmenting bruises is a challenging task in medical imaging due to limited data and annotations, diffuse boundaries, and highly variable appearance. In this work, we propose BruNet, a segmentation framework that combines a ViT-based visual encoder (a self-supervised DINOv3 or a pretrained LingBot-Vision backbone) with...
Qi-Ming Wang, Richard J. Motley, E. E. Obi et al.· 0 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.