These findings show that participants configured proactive support through prospective planning, used suggestions for both idea generation and self-monitoring, and valued lightweight visual representations alongside non-directive rhetorical framing for non-intrusive interventions.
Abstract
Writing involves diverse cognitive activities, from ideation to revision, and writers'needs vary across individuals and moments. Proactive AI promises to provide the right support at the right time, yet existing proactive tools largely focus on generic textual assistance, such as autocomplete. This paper studies the design space of proactive thought partners: AI agents that proactively offer customizable, higher-level cognitive support during writing. We instantiated this concept in a technology probe and deployed it with 16 participants for one week. The probe allows users to create partners by configuring their roles and proactivity. As users write, relevant partners take the initiative at appropriate moments to offer suggestions. Our findings show that participants configured proactive support through prospective planning, used suggestions for both idea generation and self-monitoring, and valued lightweight visual representations alongside non-directive rhetorical framing for non-intrusive interventions. We derive implications for designing proactive writing assistants around customization, timing, engagement, and representation.
It is suggested that cognitive processes can provide a promising basis for support selection in proactive writing systems and is hypothesized that Flower and Hayes' cognitive process theory of writing offers an interpretable bridge between observable writing behavior and appropriate support types.
Masahiro Yoshida, Atsuya Kobayashi, Kei Tateno et al.· 0 citations
An initial reaction to a social or community issue can feel meaningful before it is ready to become a message: people still need to clarify the claim, anticipate audience risks, and decide how much reasoning should become visible to others. We present StanceLab, a prototype for preparing a stance before entering a disc...
S. S. Hong, Mu-Tien Kuo, Wei-Ji Chen et al.· 0 citations
Insight into agency and roles in generative human-computer interaction, articulate form languages as constructs for designing generative systems, and implications for creativity support tools to empower users as explorers of possibility spaces are contributed.
Jakob Houmøller Pedersen, Anton Hedegaard Mortensen, M. Biskjaer et al.· Proceedings of the 14th Nord...· 0 citations
This full-day workshop uses the concept of dissonance to think about and experience AI in live performance, covering visual, musical, and other creative practices, and aims to develop a shared vocabulary through hands-on, practice-based engagement.
Daniel Snow, Alexander Cohen, Enrique Encinas et al.· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
The widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has prompted renewed attention to how academic writing should be assessed in higher education. While AI supports multilingual writers throughout the writing process, it also challenges traditional product-based assessment by obscuring students' learning...
L. Noor· Language Testing in Focus: A...· 0 citations
The AI-supported UX Strategy Evaluator, created by German UPA’s UX Strategy Working Group, addresses the gap by posing questions to UX strategists and UX managers, rather than attempting to provide answers or best practices.
Franziska Gronwald, Björn Rohles· i-com· 0 citations
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.