This paper proposes algorithms that model online fair division as a contextual bandit problem and achieve provable sublinear regret and proposes algorithms that model utility is an unknown function of item-agent features.
Abstract
This paper considers a novel variant of the online fair division problem involving multiple agents in which a learner sequentially observes an indivisible item that must be irrevocably allocated to one of the agents to achieve a desired balance between fairness and efficiency. Existing algorithms assume a small number of items with a sufficiently large number of copies, which ensures a good utility estimation for all item-agent pairs from noisy observed utilities. However, this assumption may not hold in many real-life applications, e.g., an online platform with a large number of users (items) who use the platform's service providers (agents) only a few times (a few copies of items), making it difficult to accurately estimate utilities for all item-agent pairs. To address this limitation, we assume utility is an unknown function of item-agent features. We propose algorithms that model online fair division as a contextual bandit problem and achieve provable sublinear regret. Our experimental results further validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.
A new randomized online algorithm for additive and submodular valuations, called Single-or-Sample, is developed, that achieves a constant-factor approximation to MMS simultaneously for all agents, with constant probability, and establishes a fundamental tradeoff between approximation and success probability.
Shuchi Chawla, Zhi-Yi Huang, Pooja Kulkarni et al.· 1 citation
This work determines the tight high-probability PROP1 guarantee of the classical Like rule, which assigns each good uniformly among the agents who value it positively, and improves when fewer agents value the same good, unlike uniform random allocation.
We study fair division of indivisible items when agents have arbitrary two-level preferences: the value of each agent for any set of items is Boolean, which need not be monotone or additive. Notably, we do not impose the standard assumption of normalization, i.e., different agents may value the empty set at different B...
Online fair division captures allocation problems in which indivisible resources arrive over time and must be assigned before future resources are known. Understanding what fairness remains achievable when allocation decisions are immediate and irrevocable is a fundamental question in this setting. We study determinist...
Sequential allocation mechanisms contain a class of widely studied mechanisms (e.g., round-robin) in the fair division of indivisible goods, where agents take turns picking items in a predefined picking order. It is known that the sequential allocation mechanisms are not truthful: when an agent's most preferred item is...
Although deciding whether a TEF1 allocation exists is NP-hard even for goods, this work identifies several tractable settings and gives an exact pseudo-polynomial algorithm for deciding TEF1 existence.
Kui-Wang Choi, Min-Ming Li, Nicholas J. Teh· 10 citations