It is found that post-pretraining QK-RMSNorm injection fails to reproduce the protection of native QK-RMSNorm, while several off-the-shelf weight-merging settings fail to recover the lost capability after VL training, highlighting the value of screening backbones with Sink Strength before VL training and narrow the intervention space toward head-selective training-time protection.
Abstract
Fine-tuning a pretrained LLM into a vision-language model (VLM) can erode the backbone's text capability, with the damage concentrated on tasks that require following exact output rules, such as instruction following, chain-of-thought reasoning graded on a strictly parsed final answer, and similar evaluations with strict graders. We trace this gap to attention-sink corruption: VL fine-tuning perturbs the early sink position that anchors a large fraction of attention probability, and how well the base LLM preserves its sink tracks how much of the affected capability survives adaptation. Building on this view, we introduce Sink Strength, a single scalar computed on the base LLM in a few seconds on a single GPU that predicts post-VL degradation without any VL training. It consistently tracks relative degradation across the six VLM-LLM pairs and multiple format-sensitive tasks. Complementing this diagnostic, we find that post-pretraining QK-RMSNorm injection fails to reproduce the protection of native QK-RMSNorm, while several off-the-shelf weight-merging settings fail to recover the lost capability after VL training. These negative results underscore the value of screening backbones with Sink Strength before VL training and narrow the intervention space toward head-selective training-time protection.
Fine-tuning a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model for a new deployment environment is expensive, yet most methods apply uniform-capacity adapters to every network region as if every region requires equal adjustment. This paper tests that assumption on five architecturally diverse VLAs (OpenVLA-OFT, $\pi_0$, SmolVLA, DTP...
Shahram Najam Syed, Arthur Jakobsson, Prayuj Sachdev et al.· 0 citations
Generative vision-language models (VLMs) such as Qwen-VL and LLaVA achieve strong zero-shot performance on tasks overlapping with their pretraining distribution, yet fail on specialized domains where the required discriminative features were never learned, a regime we term distant out-of-distribution (OOD). Standard ad...
Hung-Jen Chen, Yuek F. Ho, Ting-Yao Huang et al.· 0 citations
Pre-projector VDE tracks layer-wise accuracy and its top-ranked layers cover the oracle best layer on every task for the SigLIP-based LLaVA-Video, while giving region-level guidance for the CLIP-based Video-LLaVA.
Ru-Chen Liu, Yi Yang, Yi-Ming Xu et al.· 0 citations
Test-Time Training (TTT) adapts models to incoming test samples (e.g. out-of-distribution, (OOD)) when conventional fine-tuning is infeasible. Existing TTT methods for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) create supervision from several augmented views, each requiring forward (and often backward) passes through the entire VLM...
Rajat Modi, P. Pathak, Xin Liang et al.· 0 citations
Experiments on FastVLM-1.5B across multiple vision-language benchmarks demonstrate that VPRune achieves a favorable accuracy--compression trade-off, with particularly pronounced advantages under aggressive compression, demonstrating its practicality for resource-constrained LVLM deployment.
By thoroughly unifying 36 English hate speech datasets spanning multiple labeling schemes, this work fine-tune a generalist LLM, based on Qwen3 (Qwen Team, 2025), specifically for hate speech mitigation, demonstrating not only state-of-the-art performance on in-domain benchmarks but also substantial improvements in cro...
Lukas Edman, Daryna Dementieva, Alexander Fraser· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 14, 2026
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.