Skip to content

Latent Recurrent Transformer: Architecture Exploration, Training Strategies, and Scaling Behavior

May 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2605.26797 · 2 citations · 45 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Latent Recurrent Transformer is studied, a lightweight augmentation of autoregressive transformers that reuses a high-level source-layer hidden state from the previous token as recurrent memory for the next token, while retaining one-forward-per-token decoding with 9% latency overhead over the standard Transformer.

Abstract

We study Latent Recurrent Transformer (LRT), a lightweight augmentation of autoregressive transformers that reuses a high-level source-layer hidden state from the previous token as recurrent memory for the next token. Because this state is already computed during ordinary decoding, LRT introduces a cross-token, cross-layer latent pathway while preserving the standard attention mechanism, KV-cache interface, and one model forward per generated token. To pretrain this recurrence without sequentially unrolling the full sequence, we introduce interleaved parallel training: one full-sequence initialization forward constructs a shared buffer, followed by sequential refinement of disjoint position subsets with parallel computation within each subset. This provides every token with recurrent-memory-aware supervision at approximately 2x ideal token compute. Across 1.3B- and 2.1B-parameter nanochat-style backbones and a wide range of training budgets, LRT improves both BPB and CORE under matched effective compute. Additionally, LRT outperforms two-forward PonderLM-2 and matches a three-loop Transformer in BPB, while retaining one-forward-per-token decoding with 9% latency overhead over the standard Transformer.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Persistent Recurrent Memory Between Transformer Layers - Improves Language Model Generalization

We introduce a simple architectural modification to decoder-only transformers: a persistent recurrent state that observes hidden representations via cross-attention, updates itself through a GRU, and modulates subsequent processing via gated addition. Inserted between the lower and upper halves of a 6-layer transformer...

E. Hering · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Trading Depth for Time in Recurrent Transformers

The results suggest that temporal thinking offers a parameter-efficient alternative to increasing physical depth in recurrent Transformers, and that temporal thinking offers a parameter-efficient alternative to increasing physical depth in recurrent Transformers.

Ze-Yi Huang, Xuehai He, Yong Jae Lee et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Progressive Memory Transformer: Memory-Aware Attention for Time-Series

Time-series carry structure simultaneously at multiple scales (fine-grained variation, mid-range motifs, and global properties) and downstream tasks operate at correspondingly different scales. Most existing self-supervised learning approaches supervise representations globally via instance-level contrastive losses and...

T. Stangeland, A. Köhler, S. Mæland et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Pretraining Latent Information Feedback Transformers with Teacher Supervision

Transformer language models (LMs) are feed-forward: deep-layer representations are never fed back to shallower layers, and the only pathway for information to flow downward across generation steps is the decoded token. This narrow channel forces models to recompute intermediate results and to discard alternative contin...

Dor Tirosh, Ido Amos, Mor Geva · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Full-bandwidth transformer

This work trains 1B-parameter full-bandwidth transformers on up to 400B tokens and finds that latent feedback improves validation loss, 5-shot language-model evaluation, math and coding generation, and instruction-tuned performance.

Xi Wang, Zi-Yang Cai, Zheng Zhan et al. · 6 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

LS-AR: Future-Predictive Latent Steering in Autoregressive LLMs

Standard autoregressive (AR) models process high-level task instructions, state history, and transient tokens within a single shared sequence of tokens. Consequently, they lack the architectural mechanisms needed to isolate macro-objectives from context noise. To overcome this single-channel limitation, we introduce La...

Anubha Gupta, Eduardo Pignatelli · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.