May 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2605.26797· 2 citations· 45 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
Latent Recurrent Transformer is studied, a lightweight augmentation of autoregressive transformers that reuses a high-level source-layer hidden state from the previous token as recurrent memory for the next token, while retaining one-forward-per-token decoding with 9% latency overhead over the standard Transformer.
Abstract
We study Latent Recurrent Transformer (LRT), a lightweight augmentation of autoregressive transformers that reuses a high-level source-layer hidden state from the previous token as recurrent memory for the next token. Because this state is already computed during ordinary decoding, LRT introduces a cross-token, cross-layer latent pathway while preserving the standard attention mechanism, KV-cache interface, and one model forward per generated token. To pretrain this recurrence without sequentially unrolling the full sequence, we introduce interleaved parallel training: one full-sequence initialization forward constructs a shared buffer, followed by sequential refinement of disjoint position subsets with parallel computation within each subset. This provides every token with recurrent-memory-aware supervision at approximately 2x ideal token compute. Across 1.3B- and 2.1B-parameter nanochat-style backbones and a wide range of training budgets, LRT improves both BPB and CORE under matched effective compute. Additionally, LRT outperforms two-forward PonderLM-2 and matches a three-loop Transformer in BPB, while retaining one-forward-per-token decoding with 9% latency overhead over the standard Transformer.
We introduce a simple architectural modification to decoder-only transformers: a persistent recurrent state that observes hidden representations via cross-attention, updates itself through a GRU, and modulates subsequent processing via gated addition. Inserted between the lower and upper halves of a 6-layer transformer...
The results suggest that temporal thinking offers a parameter-efficient alternative to increasing physical depth in recurrent Transformers, and that temporal thinking offers a parameter-efficient alternative to increasing physical depth in recurrent Transformers.
Ze-Yi Huang, Xuehai He, Yong Jae Lee et al.· 0 citations
Time-series carry structure simultaneously at multiple scales (fine-grained variation, mid-range motifs, and global properties) and downstream tasks operate at correspondingly different scales. Most existing self-supervised learning approaches supervise representations globally via instance-level contrastive losses and...
T. Stangeland, A. Köhler, S. Mæland et al.· 0 citations
Transformer language models (LMs) are feed-forward: deep-layer representations are never fed back to shallower layers, and the only pathway for information to flow downward across generation steps is the decoded token. This narrow channel forces models to recompute intermediate results and to discard alternative contin...
This work trains 1B-parameter full-bandwidth transformers on up to 400B tokens and finds that latent feedback improves validation loss, 5-shot language-model evaluation, math and coding generation, and instruction-tuned performance.
Xi Wang, Zi-Yang Cai, Zheng Zhan et al.· 6 citations
Standard autoregressive (AR) models process high-level task instructions, state history, and transient tokens within a single shared sequence of tokens. Consequently, they lack the architectural mechanisms needed to isolate macro-objectives from context noise. To overcome this single-channel limitation, we introduce La...
Anubha Gupta, Eduardo Pignatelli· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 27, 2026
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.