Skip to content
Review

Best Evidence Summary on Nutritional Risk Screening and Nutritional Assessment in Adult Critically Ill Patients.

Jul 2026 · Journal of Clinical Nursing · Vol 35, pp. 5117-5130 · 0 citations · 36 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This study summarizes the current best evidence regarding nutritional risk screening and assessment in adult critically ill patients, providing optimal evidence support for standardizing nutritional risk screening and assessment in this population.

Abstract

Aim

To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the evidence related to nutritional risk screening and assessment in adult critically ill patients, providing an evidence-based decision-making reference for clinical healthcare professionals.

Design

This study was an evidence summary followed by the evidence summary reporting standard of Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing.

Method

According to the '6S' model of evidence resources, evidence on nutritional risk screening and assessment in adult critically ill patients was retrieved, including clinical decision-making, best practices, guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus, and systematic evaluations. DATA Up to date, BMJ Best Practice, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), Embase, PubMed, WanFang Medical, China Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, and relevant professional society websites including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), GIlN, the National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Yi Maitong were searched from the establishment of these databases to Dec. 2024.

Results

Eleven literature sources were included, comprising 8 guidelines, 2 expert consensuses, and 1 evidence summary. Through rigorous synthesis, 18 best practice recommendations were distilled across eight critical domains: multidisciplinary team formation, screening targets, screening timing, screening instruments, screening frequency, assessment targets, assessment core parameters, and assessment frequency.

Conclusion

This study summarizes the current best evidence regarding nutritional risk screening and assessment in adult critically ill patients, providing optimal evidence support for standardizing nutritional risk screening and assessment in this population. In clinical practice, it is essential to select the best evidence for localized and individualized application while continuously updating the evidence to standardize nursing practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE Clinical medical staff are encouraged to use evidence-based recommendations for the screening and assessment of nutritional risks in adult critically ill patients. By implementing these best evidence practices, healthcare professionals can enhance patient care and improve clinical outcomes, ensuring that nutritional needs are effectively addressed. IMPACT The effective screening and assessment of nutritional risk in critically ill patients are crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. This study summarizes 18 pieces of best evidence concerning nutritional risk screening and assessment, highlighting their importance in clinical practice. Implementing these recommendations can enhance the quality of nutritional care, reduce complications, and ensure that patients receive appropriate nutritional interventions tailored to their needs. By focusing on these best practices, healthcare providers can significantly improve the management of nutrition in critically ill patients. REPORTING

Method

This research followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing. TRIAL REGISTRATION The registration number is 'ES20221368'.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Summary of the best evidence for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients

Objective To gather, assess, and integrate the most reliable evidence regarding stress ulcer prevention in critically ill individuals, thus offering guidance for clinical application. Methods A comprehensive search was performed across various Chinese and English platforms and databases, such as UpToDate, National Guid...

Jin Wang, Xiao-Xia Tang, Lin Jin et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Best Evidence for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Assessment in Hospitalized Adults with Advanced Cancer in Chinese Clinical Practice.

By translating the summarized evidence into a culturally adapted workflow, this study provides a practical reference for integrating patient preferences, family participation, and clinical assessment in Chinese palliative care practice.

Ling Zhou, Qing-Yun Wu, Hai-Xia Du et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Best Evidence Summary for the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Objective To retrieve, appraise, and synthesize the best available evidence on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) from Chinese and international sources, and to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical nursing practice. Methods Guided by the 6S evidence pyramid model, a comprehensive electronic...

Wen-Juan Wu, Yuan-Xing Pan, Xiang An et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Summary of current evidence for digital health interventions in the screening and management of postpartum depression

Aim To identify, appraise, summarise, and synthesise current evidence on digital health strategies for postpartum depression (PPD) screening and management, and to develop practice-oriented recommendations to support evidence-informed clinical nursing practice. Methods Using the 6S evidence hierarchy to guide the retri...

Ting-Ting Xiang, Shu-Ting Zou, Wei Huang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Optimization strategies for care‑giving behaviors of family caregivers for patients with enterostomy: An evidence summary

Background To systematically retrieve and summarize evidence on optimization strategies for caregiving behaviors of family caregivers of patients with enterostomy, and to provide an evidence‑based reference for clinical practice. Methods This is an evidence summary that adopts the rigorous methodological framework of s...

Yu-Jie Liu, Yu-Hui Zhang, Ai-Ping Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.