The initial development in this area is BioMetAll, whose first version was based on backbone pre-organization, and this second version is introduced, featuring two major updates: 1) metal-specific scoring functions and 2) prediction using backbone geometry alone or in combination with first coordination sphere descriptors.
Abstract
Predicting the location of metal-binding sites in proteins is crucial for fundamental biological questions and biotechnological applications. Over the past decade, the rise in metal-bound protein structures in the Protein Data Bank, combined with advanced statistical models such as deep learning, has accelerated the development of metal-binding site prediction tools. Several approaches are now available, offering high-quality benchmarks and predictive performance. Our initial development in this area is BioMetAll, whose first version was based on backbone pre-organization. Here, we introduce its second version, featuring two major updates: 1) metal-specific scoring functions and 2) prediction using backbone geometry alone or in combination with first coordination sphere descriptors. Apart from demonstrating metal sensitivity and yielding better benchmarking results, this new version allows the assessment of the influence of considering the metal’s first coordination sphere versus backbone pre-organization on how metallic species bind to proteins.
It is found that, while AF3 can perform well in favourable settings, this performance is uneven across applications and its predictions and use of confidence metrics will depend strongly on the specific application area and must be interpreted with respect to training-set overlap.
O. Follonier, Yan Liu, Pablo Campomanes et al.· bioRxiv· 1 citation
Novo-1, a coarse-grained cofolding framework for binding- affinity prediction, offers more than one order of magnitude speed-up over the leading open-source baseline, Boltz-2, and demonstrates meaningful selectivity, separating the binding affinities of identical compounds between on-targets and related off-targets.
Nikhil Shenoy, David Errington, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Modelling sequences both “dry” and in the presence of explicit potassium cations are suggested as a simple, practical way to sample alternative conformations and to expose disordered regions that current predictors tend to over-fold.
COACH-D 2.0 is introduced, a substantially enhanced template-based method for predicting protein-ligand binding sites and features three key advances: integration of multimeric templates from Q-BioLiP into the authors' in-house library, a new multimeric structure processing module enabling binding site prediction for protein complexes, and an efficient template screening strategy that significantly boosts both prediction speed and accuracy.
Xiaoyu An, Hong Wei, Wenkai Wang et al.· Genomics, Proteomics & Bioin...· 0 citations
Despite challenges related to data sparsity and conformational variability, ViTs show strong performance and high robustness in structure-based affinity prediction tasks, underscore their effectiveness in learning spatial patterns and suggest broader applicability to related tasks, such as protein-protein or protein-nucleic acid interaction modeling.
Jakub Poziemski, Paweł Siedlecki· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
A category-stratified, statistically powered benchmark comparing pose prediction from receptor conformational ensembles against AlphaFold2, used as a matched static-structure baseline, across 29 protein–ligand systems spanning cryptic-pocket, induced-fit, water-mediated, and autoimmune-indication target classes is presented.
Ryan Varghese, Pooja Tiwary, Krishil Oswal· bioRxiv· 0 citations