MentalHospital, a virtual evaluation environment for LLM-based psychiatric clinical encounters, and MentalEval, five domain-specific evaluators covering communication empathy, interviewing professionalism, clinical-note quality, diagnostic rigor, and treatment appropriateness, trained with rubric-grounded SFT and expert-guided DPO are introduced.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on isolated psychiatric tasks, including dialogue, diagnosis, and treatment planning, yet existing benchmarks rarely simulate complete psychiatric clinical encounters. We introduce $\textbf{MentalHospital}$, a virtual evaluation environment for LLM-based psychiatric clinical encounters. MentalHospital instantiates the Subjective Interviewing, Objective Examination, Diagnostic Assessment, and Treatment Planning (S.O.A.P.) workflow, using skill-augmented standardized patients constructed from 1,193 de-identified psychiatric electronic health record (EHR) cases spanning all major ICD-11 categories and 76 disorders. Each encounter is assessed through a dual-track protocol that combines objective comparison against EHR-derived references with subjective assessment of clinical process quality. To scale specialist judgment, we develop $\textbf{MentalEval}$, five domain-specific evaluators covering communication empathy, interviewing professionalism, clinical-note quality, diagnostic rigor, and treatment appropriateness, trained with rubric-grounded SFT and expert-guided DPO. Survey responses from 22 clinicians support MentalHospital's clinical fidelity (3.88/5), while MentalEval achieves strong expert alignment with an average QWK of 0.944. Benchmarking shows that even the strongest LLM trails clinicians by 37.28 percentage points in objective psychiatric competence, with mental status assessment as a key bottleneck.
This study provides a framework for evaluating LLMs in psychiatry and supporting their safe, evidence-based integration into mental health practice and is anticipated to improve diagnostic accuracy, especially among non-specialists.
Vittorio De Vita, Bianca Destro Castaniti, Antonio Cristiano et al.· Monolith alpha· 0 citations
The structure and initial clinical use of Virtual Mental Assistance (VMA), a rule-based, web-based psychiatric assessment and followup system developed by a group, is described and the findings are limited to the technical and structural feasibility of this approach.
Zs. Erdei, G. Faludi· Neuropsychopharmacologia Hun...· 0 citations
Large language models are best understood as emerging assessment-support tools rather than replacements for clinical evaluation because the limited pace of academic validation means that, at present, LLMs are best understood as emerging assessment-support tools rather than replacements for clinical evaluation.
Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Francine Cheng Ty, A. Hua et al.· Journal of Psychopathology a...· 0 citations
These findings support the use of LLM-generated hospital courses as starting drafts when paired with clinician review and institutional safeguards, and errors were common, but perceived potential harm was low, even assuming use without clinician correction.
Jasmine E. Kim, J. Hron, Daniel J. Kats et al.· Hospital Pediatrics· 0 citations
Current evidence supports clinician-supervised use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems rather than autonomous diagnosis, pending prospective and specialty-specific evaluation.
Yun-Jia Wu, Qi Yan, Dingcheng Tian· AI Medicine· 0 citations
MIND was able to answer many questions about escitalopram in a manner deemed accurate, complete, and safe by psychiatrists the majority of the time, and represents a step towards building safe LLM systems to enhance patient education in psychiatry.
Alexander J. Hish, A. Nagendran, S. Compton· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.