Skip to content
Open access

A Bayesian composite risk approach for stochastic optimal control and Markov decision processes

Aug 2026 · Mathematical programming · 1 citation · 48 references

TL;DR

The new modeling paradigm subsumes several classical SOC/MDP formulations, including risk-averse and distributionally robust SOC/MDPs as well as partially observed and Bayes-adaptive MDPs, and generates so-called preference robust SOC/MDP models.

Abstract

Inspired by Shapiro et al. [74], we consider a stochastic optimal control (SOC) and Markov decision process (MDP) under simultaneous epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties using Bayesian composite risk (BCR) measures. The proposed BCR-SOC/MDP model evaluates the risk of stagewise cost via a two-layer framework: the inner risk measure tackles aleatoric uncertainty conditional on a latent environment parameter, while the outer risk measure deals with the epistemic uncertainty of the inner risk under the Bayesian posterior. The resulting time-varying risk evaluation induced by Bayesian updating enables an information-adaptive risk-sensitive decision framework. Unlike [74], our policies are allowed to depend explicitly on the posterior belief, reflecting that accumulated information about epistemic uncertainty can influence the assessment of future aleatoric uncertainty and, consequently, the decision maker’s actions [79]. The new modeling paradigm subsumes several classical SOC/MDP formulations, including risk-averse and distributionally robust SOC/MDPs as well as partially observed and Bayes-adaptive MDPs, and generates so-called preference robust SOC/MDP models. Moreover, we derive conditions under which the BCR-SOC/MDP model is well-defined, show that finite-horizon BCR-SOC/MDP models can be solved via dynamic programming, and extend the analysis to the infinite-horizon case. Under standard conditions, we establish asymptotic convergence of the optimal values and optimal policies as data accumulate, and provide quantitative error bounds for several representative classes of risk measures. To enhance computational tractability, we develop a hyper-parameter discretization approach for the posterior belief space. Finally, we carry out numerical tests on a spread betting problem and an inventory control problem, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed model and numerical schemes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

A Bayesian Model Updating Framework for Systems Under Hybrid Uncertainties via Probability Integral Transform and Maximum Mean Discrepancy

The probability integral transform (PIT) converts the stochastic simulator into a deterministic map of distribution-free latent variables and epistemic parameters, and Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (TMCMC) is then employed for posterior inference and model evidence estimation.

Shi-Jie Zhong, Jiang-Feng Fu · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Quantifying Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: Belief-Dependent Robustness for Safe Sequential Decision Making

RATTL targets runtime safety for agents, including LLM-based systems, acting under uncertainty, and proves a Safety Sandwich: the RATTL value lies between the uninformed robust value and the full- knowledge optimum, with a gap that vanishes as the posterior concentrates.

D. Ganguly, Jan Křetinský · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

From Frequentist to Bayesian Contextual Optimization

Bayesian contextual optimization (BCO) is proposed, a framework that maintains a Gibbs posterior over the parameter space that weights candidate models by their empirical decision quality rather than statistical fit, thereby avoiding commitment to a potentially misspecified likelihood while encoding the full distributi...

Zhuo-Jun Xie, Adam F. Abdin, Yi-Ping Fang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Ground-Truth Framework for Uncertainty Disentanglement with Posterior Risk

Reliable uncertainty estimates are critical in safety-sensitive applications. For such estimates to be useful in practice, it is crucial to understand the sources underlying a model's uncertainty, motivating the disentanglement of total uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. Existing notions of uncertain...

Frieder Wizgall, Georg Tirpitz, Moritz Seiler et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Risk-Aware Goal-Oriented Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design

A risk-aware framework that composes risk at three levels, each generalizing an ingredient of classical $I- and $G-optimal design: a deviation measure of the posterior predictive uncertainty, a risk measure across the prediction domain, and a risk measure over datasets.

J. Jakeman, Rebekah White, B. G. van Bloemen Waanders et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Learning to Control Coupled-Dynamics Environments with Joint Markov Decision Processes

A nonparametric distributional Bellman optimality operator for JMDPs is defined, and it is proved that when the induced marginal MDP has a unique optimal policy, its iterates converge in Wasserstein distance to the optimal joint return law.

Ege C. Kaya, Aliasghar Pourghani, Mahsa Ghasemi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.