PDDLCoder is presented, an agentic framework for PDDL generation from natural language that iteratively generates, analyzes, and refines planning specifications and demonstrates the effectiveness of agentic PDDL generation for planning and establishes a reproducible benchmark for future research on LLM-assisted symbolic planning.
Abstract
LLMs remain unreliable for long-horizon planning, often generating logically inconsistent or non-applicable plans. Recent hybrid methods instead translate natural language into the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), allowing symbolic planners to produce verifiable plans. However, existing methods frequently rely on rigid generation pipelines, a partial PDDL definition, or human feedback. Furthermore, their evaluation is hindered by the lack of standardized benchmarks with automated verification. To address these limitations, we present PDDLCoder, an agentic framework for PDDL generation from natural language that iteratively generates, analyzes, and refines planning specifications. We further introduce NL-pddlgym, a benchmark dataset comprising 711 planning problems across 23 domains with executable gym environments for the automated verification of plan applicability. Experiments on the NL-pddlgym test set containing 106 problems across 4 held-out domains show that PDDLCoder generates applicable plans for 89.6\% of tested planning problems. This improves upon our adaptations of previous PDDL generation methods, which achieved up to 45.3\%, and outperforms direct LLM planning approaches, which reached up to 74.5\% on the same test set. Our work demonstrates the effectiveness of agentic PDDL generation for planning and establishes a reproducible benchmark for future research on LLM-assisted symbolic planning.
Study of an end-to-end NL-to-PDDL pipeline that combines LLM generation, checks in terms of PDDL parsing, planning and validation, a domain-conformance checker, an LLM critic, and iterative repair shows that structured repair can be useful, and that PDDL~2.1 remains challenging for reference reconstruction, even when o...
J. Rosa, Pedro Santos, Valdemar Oliveira et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces a semantic-preserving PDDL-to-Lean conversion, and uses an LLM to generate both the generalized plan and the formal proof that it solves every instance satisfying the domain constraints, and evaluates this approach on 13 commonly used benchmark domains.
Katharina Stein, Chaahat Jain, J. Hoffmann et al.· 0 citations
This work leveraging LLMs to generate instance-generation programs, with built-in soundness guarantees through prescribed checks, and shows that these automatically generated instance generators return large numbers of sound and diverse instances efficiently.
Nicola J. Müller, Naya Rudolph, Katharina Stein et al.· 0 citations
Current open-weight models cannot guarantee satisfaction of the test constraints required for reliable automated model repair, and this paper evaluates the ability of recent open-weight large language models to perform this repair task using an LLM-only approach.
Results show that organizing solver feedback into generation, verification, and repair roles enables more scalable and faithful annotation-free symbolic planning.
Cheng-Hao Zhang, Yi-Kai Mao, Hao-Yu Gao et al.· 0 citations
This paper proposes a neuro-symbolic framework that combines large language model (LLM)-driven task planning with formal symbolic verification and reactive Behavior Tree execution to support high-precision operations in industrial assembly. While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate expertise in interpreting natura...
Dario Antonelli, Xiao-Lin Yang, L. Urbani et al.· Applied Informatics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.