This work proposes AsyTO, an Asymmetric Temporal Operator, an Asymmetric Temporal Operator that factorizes the tensor of per-variable operators into shared but distinct history-reading and future-writing temporal modes with per-variable mode-wise gains, complemented by a low-rank periodic prototype and a cycle-separable factorization of the temporal modes.
Abstract
Multivariate time-series forecasting faces a structural dilemma: sharing one temporal predictor across variables is parameter-efficient but forces heterogeneous variables through an identical history-to-future map, whereas learning an independent predictor per variable restores flexibility at a cost that grows with the product of variable count, context length, and horizon. We argue that this dilemma dissolves once the object being compressed is the forecasting operator rather than the observed series. Auditing per-variable linear history-to-future maps across standard benchmarks, we find that a phase-locked seasonal component paired with a compact residual operator outperforms a dense phase-blind reference in most audited settings. The residual transport is also directional: lag-invariant alternatives consistently underperform asymmetric history-to-future maps. Guided by this structure, we propose AsyTO, an Asymmetric Temporal Operator that factorizes the tensor of per-variable operators into shared but distinct history-reading and future-writing temporal modes with per-variable mode-wise gains, complemented by a low-rank periodic prototype and a cycle-separable factorization of the temporal modes. Each forecast reads only its own variable's history, so parameters and compute grow linearly in the number of variables. Across eleven benchmarks and multiple forecast horizons, AsyTO attains the best lightweight error in 30 of 44 dataset-horizon settings, locating at the accuracy-compute Pareto frontier.
A Params-Per-Pair diagnostic is introduced that predicts from dataset properties alone whether structural priors will help and reveals a horizon-dependent complementarity: the structural prior contributes 33% of the gain at short horizons but 88% at long horizons, confirming that time-invariant knowledge compensates as...
C. Mohapatra, Rohit Malshe, J. Pachón· 0 citations
This work proposes CvLoss, a plug-in structural regularizer that constrains forecast residuals on a cross-variable graph and shows that CvLoss consistently improves competitive forecasting models, outperforms representative learning objectives, and is compatible with a variety of forecasting backbones.
Kuiye Ding, Yifan Hu, Hanchen Wang et al.· 1 citation
ResDIF, a Residual Disentanglement framework for Interpretable financial time series Forecasting inspired by Asset Pricing Theory, is proposed and demonstrates that ResDIF outperforms existing methods while providing actionable interpretability support for refined portfolio risk management.
Chengwei Fu, Gang Xiao, Yu-Chao Zhang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
CoRe is proposed, a model-agnostic learning objective for direct multivariate forecasting that replaces pointwise supervision with two output-space constraints: a frequency coherence loss that aligns predicted and target spectra, and a low-rank relational graph loss that matches sampled pairwise differences in a target...
Xiao-Yu Lin, Hui-Ran Duan, Yi-Ning Liu et al.· 0 citations
DAT-TimeXer is proposed, a structure-aware adaptation of TimeXer for closing-price forecasting that achieves the lowest mean forecasting errors among the compared models in the one-step evaluations and maintains lower errors at horizons of 1, 3, 5, and 10 in the evaluated multi-step tasks.
Si-Xing Liu, Quan-Xiang Lan, Jing Zhang et al.· Complex & Intelligent Sy...· 0 citations
The revised evidence supports lower price-level errors, while directional and significance results are mixed across markets, and the findings establish cross-market consistency rather than transfer learning.