It is found that cross-language feature sharing is model- and architecture-dependent in this sample and appears at different depths in different models.
Abstract
Multilingual language models can solve the same mathematical problem in different languages, but it remains unclear whether they rely on shared features or on language-specific computations that only produce similar outputs. We study this question in five models from four families using the Multilingual Grade School Math (MGSM) dataset, with problems solved in English, German, French, Spanish, Russian, and Chinese, retaining problems with valid reasoning traces in all six languages and replaying those traces through the model to record representations at multiple layers. For each model, we first use Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) to identify layers with cross-language alignment. At each selected layer, we train two sparse autoencoders (SAE): a baseline reconstruction-only model and a contrastive variant introduced in this work, the Geometry-Invariant SAE (GI-SAE). GI-SAE supplements the reconstruction loss with an Information Noise-Contrastive Estimation (InfoNCE) loss that trains the encoder to produce similar activations for traces of the same problem, regardless of language or token position. We then test whether the resulting shared features are functionally interchangeable by swapping their values between languages during the model's forward pass and measuring the resulting change in output, quantified by Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence per feature. Although GI-SAE yields higher CKA and Jaccard similarity at nearly every layer, higher geometric similarity does not consistently imply greater functional interchangeability. We find that cross-language feature sharing is model- and architecture-dependent in this sample and appears at different depths in different models. GI-SAE primarily amplifies cross-language structure already present: the pattern is model-specific, with strengthening in Qwen, no functional benefit in Gemma, and mixed layer-dependent effects in Llama and Phi.
This work shows that a single shared SAE can replace a collection of dedicated per-model SAEs, and combines a shared dictionary with model-specific encoder-decoder pairs to achieve near-dedicated-SAE reconstruction quality.
Daniil A. Ognev, Célian Vasson, Li-Jie Hu et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces Relative Generalization Invariance (RGI), the invariance of the validation-loss difference between any two tokens across models, and shows that RGI approximately holds across a wide range of optimizers and moderate architectural variations, suggesting that these choices induce an approximately unif...
Feng-Zhuo Zhang, Shu-Che Wang, Sheng-Gui Li et al.· 0 citations
Penn Treebank and a 10k-vocabulary stress test confirm that geodesic decoding transfers across corpora and larger |V|, while hyperbolic curvature helps selectively, and characterize boundary collapse in naive hyperbolic recurrence and show how Mobius stabilization restores trainability.
Centroid Intervention Fusion is proposed, a projection fusion framework that consolidates multiple multilingual intervention projections into a single language-shared operator and outperforms the strongest prior pairwise intervention baseline by up to +3.3% across four model backbones.
It is argued that soft-token fusion requires stronger alignment objectives and schema-aware design before it can serve as a reliable route to relational prediction.
Francisco Galuppo Azevedo, Clarissa Lima Loures· 0 citations
TASSO, a new paradigm that efficiently preserves the latent space geometry while ensuring network plasticity, is introduced with two complementary techniques: subspace learning and geometry-aware knowledge distillation.
Chang-Ming Sun, Francesco Barbato, Matteo Caligiuri et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.