A Riemann-normal-coordinate Levenberg-Marquardt method (RNC-LM), which eliminates the tangential component of residual acceleration order by order in a moving tangent frame, making the actual objective reduction more consistent with the linear model prediction of LM.
Abstract
Nonlinear least-squares optimization is central to regression, physics-informed neural networks, and other machine-learning tasks. Such problems have a natural geometric interpretation, model predictions form a manifold in data space, while the chosen parameterization can introduce parameter-effects curvature that becomes a dominant source of nonlinearity. This exposes a limitation of the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) method, its tangent-space step is applied as a straight update in parameter coordinates. Geodesic acceleration gives a second-order correction, but its removal of parameter-effect curvature is exact only in the infinitesimal-step limit. We propose a Riemann-normal-coordinate Levenberg-Marquardt method (RNC-LM) to improve this consistency for finite optimization steps. By reformulating the geodesic equation, RNC-LM extends geodesic acceleration to arbitrary-order corrections and constructs finite-step updates with progressively higher reparameterization consistency. A line search along the resulting RNC curve controls the traveled distance while keeping the cost close to standard LM. The method eliminates the tangential component of residual acceleration order by order in a moving tangent frame, making the actual objective reduction more consistent with the linear model prediction of LM. On classical nonlinear least-squares benchmarks, RNC-LM improves convergence and robustness in curved valleys and rank-deficient problems. On a reaction-diffusion PINN failure-mode benchmark, it reduces the relative L2 error to the order of 1e-3 and recovers a physically meaningful solution. On a large-scale machine-learning potential-energy-surface fitting task, it achieves a 34-fold speedup over standard LM.
Energy natural gradient descent (ENGD) aligns parameter updates with the curvature of an underlying function-space energy, but existing formulations assume an unconstrained Euclidean parameter domain. We introduce \EMNGDfull{}, a manifold optimization framework for physics-informed and variational neural PDE solvers wh...
This paper proposes a preconditioned ordinary hyperbolic smoothing modified L-BFGS framework for finite minimax problems. To mitigate the deterioration of Euclidean conditioning as the smoothing parameter decreases, a problem-derived hyperbolic majorization preconditioner is incorporated into the initial L-BFGS metric;...
A hyperbolic-majorization preconditioned three-term nonlinear conjugate-gradient framework for nonconvex finite minimax optimization that yields a Dai--Liao-type conjugacy relation, enhanced sufficient descent, a smoothing-parameter-uniform Armijo lower bound, fixed-smoothing global first-order convergence and complexi...
Nonlinear-manifold reduced-order models for parametrized finite element problems can achieve substantial compression both in the number of generalized (latent) coordinates and, through sampling-and-weighting hyperreduction, in the number of sampled elements/integration points. Yet current sampling-and-weighting approac...
J. A. Hernández, S. A. de Parga, R. Rossi· 1 citation
The Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm is the most widely used method for solving nonlinear least-squares problems, as it combines the robustness of steepest descent with the fast local convergence of the Gauss-Newton method. However, its computational cost can become prohibitive for large-scale problems because each i...
We study the local errors of classical machine-learning surrogate models, which approximate the time evolution of the one-dimensional viscous Burgers equation. Four models are compared on the same prediction task, using the spatial grid values directly: radial basis function (RBF) kernel ridge regression (KRR), linear...
Youssef Oubari· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.