ChartSync is introduced, an expert-validated benchmark constructed via a programmatic rendering pipeline that guarantees deterministic visuo-logical coupling for the ground truth and deconstructs failure paradigms to identify core meta-abilities for guiding future multimodal architectures.
Abstract
Generative image editing models struggle with structured statistical charts when data modifications require geometric synchronization. We formalize this task as Visuo-Logical Cascading Editing (VLCE). However, existing methods remain confined to localized text substitutions and struggle with dependency-aware cascading updates. To systematically evaluate this capability, we introduce ChartSync, an expert-validated benchmark constructed via a programmatic rendering pipeline that guarantees deterministic visuo-logical coupling for the ground truth. ChartSync comprises 870 triplets across 9 chart categories and 4 task types, including 235 geometry-coupled VLCE instances that specifically test cascading text-to-geometry synchronization. We further evaluate these instances via a two-tier framework combining objective visual metrics with a vision-language model judge paradigm to assess low-level fidelity alongside multimodal comprehension and reasoning. Evaluating 14 image editing models and one code-mediated pipeline reveals a nuanced capability gap: most open-source models suffer severe drops in geometric synchronization, while only two frontier proprietary models show emerging VLCE capability, with their residual errors mainly involving semantic isolation and background corruption. Our detailed error analysis deconstructs these failure paradigms to identify core meta-abilities for guiding future multimodal architectures. The ChartSync dataset and code are publicly released at https://github.com/kaka-yjk/ChartSyncCodebase.
This work introduces VisEditBench, a benchmark of 1,395 human-annotated visualization code-editing tasks grounded in realistic visualization workflows and failure cases, and proposes VisEditAgent, a render-grounded editing framework that iteratively generates, executes, validates, and refines candidate edits.
DVBench is introduced, a benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on data videos, a storytelling medium that integrates dynamic charts with structured narratives, and decompose data video understanding into five dimensions, identifying two notable phenomena.
Bomiao Wang, Zekai Shao, Jiexiang Lan et al.· 0 citations
Charts are structured visual compositions whose elements have distinct functional roles, semantic correspondences, and visibility relations. This structural view motivates evaluating whether models can understand and manipulate charts at the layer level. Existing chart benchmarks, however, primarily assess the correctn...
Xiao-Chuan Zhong, Yi-Fan Hou, Chen-Xi Pang et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces Edit2TikZ, a comprehensive benchmark for scientific figure editing tasks, featuring 1,548 diverse and high-quality samples, and constructs a human-aligned evaluation framework to measure whether a requested edit is completed while irrelevant content is preserved.
Zong-Yun Zhang, Jiacheng Ruan, Xian Gao et al.· 0 citations
Using a three-phase protocol that separates diagram-only, diagram-plus-description, and description-only inputs, it is shown across five open-weight and closed-source VLMs that description-only performance is statistically indistinguishable from diagram-plus-description performance, establishing structured descriptions...
Khan Raiyan Ibne Reza, Sanjana Aktar Maria, Sumaiya Tabassum Nimi et al.· 0 citations
The OmniEdit-Bench provides a comprehensive and reliable testbed for evaluating instruction-based video editing and offers insights into future research directions, including an accuracy-aware penalty mechanism that conditions other scores on accuracy, preventing visually plausible but incorrect edits from receiving in...
Chenxuan Miao, Yutong Feng, Yi Lu et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.