Skip to content
Preprint

ICO: Enhancing Semantic-Shift Jailbreaks via Iterative Context Optimization

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 34 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is revealed that contexts with stronger semantic-shift capabilities are more likely to guide models toward recovering harmful meanings and achieving successful jailbreaks, and a black-box context-aware semantic-shift jailbreak framework with Iterative Context Optimization is proposed.

Abstract

Foundation models have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks, but they remain vulnerable. To investigate such vulnerabilities, semantic-shift jailbreaks have recently emerged as a promising attack paradigm. They bypass explicit safety mechanisms by replacing harmful terms in original harmful questions with benign alternatives and leveraging contextual information to induce the target model to reinterpret these alternatives as their corresponding harmful concepts. However, existing semantic-shift jailbreaks often achieve limited effectiveness. In this work, we reveal that this limitation arises from overlooking the semantic-shift capability of contexts. Through systematic analysis, we find that contexts exhibit substantially different abilities in inducing semantic shifts: contexts with stronger semantic-shift capabilities are more likely to guide models toward recovering harmful meanings and achieving successful jailbreaks. Based on this finding, we systematically identify and distill the characteristics of effective contexts and propose a black-box context-aware semantic-shift jailbreak framework with Iterative Context Optimization (ICO). In each iteration, ICO leverages these characteristics and feedback from the target model to optimize contexts. Extensive experiments on three datasets and eight target foundation models demonstrate that ICO consistently outperforms eight state-of-the-art baselines, achieving an average attack success rate of 74.6%.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

SAFEGuard: Detect Optimization-Based Jailbreak Attacks Through Harmful Semantic Analysis and Fluency Measurement

This work proposes a unified detection framework SAFEGuard which incorporates a hybrid fluency measurement based on cross-layer distribution distance and perplexity, and the analysis of harmful semantics through gradient matching, and demonstrates the effectiveness of SAFEGuard against evolving jailbreak attacks.

Quoc le Viet Vo, Trung Le, D. Ranasinghe et al. · 0 citations
2026

Semantic Isomorphism Attacks and Defense Evaluation for Jailbreaking Large Language Models

The safety alignment of large language models (LLMs) faces persistent challenges from jailbreak attacks. While existing methods mostly leverage prompt engineering or adversarial optimization, we identify and formalize an underexplored semantic isomorphism vulnerability where harmful and safe scenarios share highly cons...

Fan Yang, Ke Wang, Wenzhou Dou et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Validity-Aware Jailbreak Evaluation for Large Language Models

This work proposes Sequential Epistemic and Action-Level Validation (SEAV), a verification-centric jailbreak evaluation framework that decomposes responses into ordered steps and evaluates both validity and correctness, and shows that enforcing correctness substantially reshapes measured robustness.

Qilong Wu, Sahil Wadhwa, Pranab Mohanty et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

MMJailBench: A Factorized Benchmark for Disentangling Multimodal Jailbreak Vulnerabilities

MMJailBench is introduced, a factorized benchmark that systematically varies and combines these factors under controlled configurations, enabling fine-grained comparison and factor-level attribution and a modular multimodal jailbreak evaluation suite with full and lightweight configurations, multiple judge options, and...

Tian-Shi Wang, Jing-Song Wang, Ya-Fei Huang et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Explaining Jailbreaks: Structured and Interpretable Safety Assessment for Large Language Models

This work proposes an explanation-aware safety framework that augments binary harmfulness detection with structured, human-interpretable explanations capturing severity, strategies, trigger spans, ratio-nales, and derived safety factors, and introduces a human–LLM hybrid annotation and canonicaliza-tion pipeline.

Sunghee Dong, Sungwon Yi, K. Bae et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

LLMs as Linguistic Chameleons: Decoupling Semantics and Structure for Privacy-Preserving Communication

As Large Language Model (LLM) APIs become increasingly integrated into privacy-sensitive workflows, ensuring inference-time privacy without compromising task utility remains a major challenge. Existing approaches preserve most of the original semantic content to maintain downstream performance, but this also leaves exp...

Yu-Zhu Mao, Liang Zhao · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.