EvolveNet is introduced, a paradigm of collaborative harness evolution that moves experience extraction to the data and introduces scope-typed, evidence-guided program aggregation, which improves the shared harness in all five settings.
Abstract
The capabilities of an LLM agent depend not only on its model but on the harness: the executable program that constructs context, invokes tools, verifies results, and recovers from failure. Recent work shows that evolving the harness yields persistent improvements without updating model weights. Existing approaches, however, assume that all execution experience can be routed to a single optimizer, which evolves one harness along a sequential trajectory. Real agent ecosystems violate that assumption: users, organizations, and environments generate isolated streams of experience that cannot be pooled, so the experience most worth learning from is exactly the experience that cannot be directly centralized. We introduce EvolveNet, a paradigm of collaborative harness evolution that moves experience extraction to the data. A shared harness is broadcast to data-local agent deployments, each of which evolves it on its own workload. Only the resulting program adaptations are composed into an updated shared harness and redistributed, so that every participating agent inherits operational experience discovered by the others. By shifting the aggregation boundary from raw workloads to learned adaptations, EvolveNet keeps workloads local and allows multiple evolutionary searches to proceed concurrently with reduced serial depth. Because independently modified programs cannot be averaged like model parameters and may conflict when composed, EvolveNet introduces scope-typed, evidence-guided program aggregation. Across five settings spanning text-to-SQL, data-science coding, competitive programming, software engineering, and agentic workflows, EvolveNet improves the shared harness in all five, with the largest gains under heterogeneous workloads, and ablations attribute the improvement to composition of adaptations from different agents rather than to selecting among them.
It is found that generated harnesses remain substantially behind mature human-engineered references on code and on search and research, while matching or exceeding the selected references on writing and machine-learning experimentation, with large variation in execution cost.
Yu-Hao Wu, Jing-Yuan Zhang, Jia-Jun Shi et al.· 12 citations· ⚡1
EvoHarnessBench is introduced, a benchmark for evaluating agents under controlled harness evolution across three axes (tools, skills, and agents), and establishes harness evolution as a distinct challenge for building agents that can keep pace with an evolving harness while preserving previously effective behavior.
Zi-Xuan Ke, Vaidehi Patil, Hai-Zhou Shi et al.· 5 citations· ⚡1
This work introduces Harness-R1, the first method, to the authors' knowledge, that makes failure-conditioned, lifecycle-wide editing of an existing executable runtime a learned capability, and post-trains a dedicated harness engineer with online reinforcement learning so that its edits are optimized for the realized ta...
Shuai Shao, Kangning Zhang, Qingyao Li et al.· 10 citations· ⚡2
HarnessCompass is proposed, a novel automatic harness evolution framework built around constrained evolution, proactive feedback, and component-wise optimization that improves Pass@1 from 54\% to 66\% in only 5 evolution iterations, outperforming AHE in both effectiveness and evolution efficiency.
Luan Zhang, Ruo-Chen Zhou, Dan-Dan Song et al.· 10 citations· ⚡1
HELIX provides an auditable interface for studying model-harness co-evolution for recursive self-improvement and expands current capability and creates learning signal for the next model; model updates motivate the next round of harness evolution.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.