Jul 2026· Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon· Vol 10, pp. 507 - 515· 0 citations· 14 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Re-evaluation of molecular profiles using ctDNA enabled the exploratory identification of NeoRAS wild-type patients, who could potentially benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, in a real-world setting.
Abstract
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has recently become available in Japan, but its clinical utility in daily practice remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated 19 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who underwent plasma-based CGP (Guardant360 CDx) between November 2023 and May 2025. ctDNA was detected in 18 of 19 patients (95%) with previously treated mCRC. The median turnaround time from blood collection to result was 11 days (range: 7–15). The median number of gene alterations was 5 (range: 1–29), and pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations were identified in 15 patients (79%). ctDNA was preferentially selected over tissue CGP in patients with small tumor burden, lack of contemporary tumor sample, or double cancer (considering spatial and temporal heterogeneity). Three patients initially identified with RAS mutant tumors by tissue were subsequently identified as RAS wild-type by plasma CGP. Those were treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy, resulting in partial response or stable disease. These observations suggest that plasma-based CGP may provide additional molecular information that could be clinically informative in mCRC in a real-world setting. Although the findings should be interpreted as exploratory, re-evaluation of molecular profiles using ctDNA enabled the exploratory identification of NeoRAS wild-type patients, who could potentially benefit from anti-EGFR therapy.
Targeted cfDNA sequencing is feasible in preoperative CRC patients undergoing CME and provides a molecular baseline for future perioperative studies, support its potential for minimally invasive molecular characterization and define its prognostic and clinical utility.
Mária Škereňová, E. Halašová, M. Šarlinová et al.· Current molecular medicine· 0 citations
Tissue and plasma CGP were complementary rather than interchangeable in this selected cohort: either modality alone would have missed clinically relevant findings.
Ankur Bahl, N. Rohatgi, S. Karanth et al.· Current Oncology· 0 citations
The findings suggest that tumor-informed ctDNA analysis provides a promising approach for post-operative MRD surveillance and recurrence risk stratification in CRC, however, the small sample size, lack of external validation, and absence of neoadjuvant-treated patients preclude definitive conclusions.
William C. Cho, Yingyu Wang, Qian-Qian Yao et al.· Oncology Research· 0 citations
In this diverse cohort, a positive ctDNA TF at baseline was associated with worse outcomes in mHSPC and may potentially complement current further risk stratification tools.
C. Nguyen, I. Tsung, Jessica K. Lee et al.· JCO Precision Oncology· 0 citations
Routine targeted NGS provides detailed molecular characterisation of CRC and generates information relevant to biomarker-informed clinical decision-making in real-world practice, however, targeted panels alone were insufficient to establish robust molecular subgroups in this retrospective cohort.
Afonso Cunha, C. Robalo, C. Lemos et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations