Aug 2026· Microorganisms· Vol 14· 0 citations· 127 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review evaluates the material design principles and classifications of inorganic, organic, and hybrid piezoelectric nanocoatings and detail their multifaceted antibacterial mechanisms and trace their therapeutic potential in orthopedic and dental implants, as well as wound management.
Abstract
Implant-associated infections (IAIs) persist as a critical complication in biomaterial transplantation, driven by rapid microbial colonization, biofilm encapsulation, and escalating antibiotic resistance. Conventional antibiotic-based treatments and passive antimicrobial coatings often fail to achieve long-term infection control due to limited biofilm penetration, localized cytotoxicity, and active agent depletion. To overcome these limitations, piezoelectric nanocomposite coatings utilize a dynamic, stimulus-responsive framework that converts physiological mechanical forces or external ultrasound into localized electrical signals. These surface-bound electric fields systematically mitigate bacterial adhesion, eradicate mature biofilms via targeted reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, disrupt microbial metabolic pathways, and favorably modulate the peri-implant immune microenvironment while supporting host tissue repair. This review evaluates the material design principles and classifications of inorganic, organic, and hybrid piezoelectric nanocoatings. We detail their multifaceted antibacterial mechanisms and trace their therapeutic potential in orthopedic and dental implants, as well as wound management. Lastly, we analyze current engineering bottlenecks to chart a clear trajectory for their clinical translation.
This review delineates the evolution from fundamental material design principles, such as NC morphology control and surface chemistry modulation, to the development of NC-based platforms capable of disrupting mature biofilms and eliminating pathogenic bacteria.
Tejal V. Patil, Rumi Acharya, Ki-Taek Lim· Small· 0 citations
This review systematically summarizes the major antibacterial mechanisms of hydrogels, including cationic contact-killing, chemical antibacterial activity mediated by metal ions and reactive halogen species, nanozyme-catalyzed reactions and bidirectional regulation of reactive oxygen species, as well as photothermal sy...
Peng Liu, Lin Chen, Jin-Jun Tian et al.· Gels· 0 citations
A hydrogel-enabled perspective supports indication-driven design and more rigorous evaluation of local biomaterial strategies for PJI and indicates that hydrogels are not universally superior when mechanical support, established surgical familiarity, or long-term structural stability is required.
Chao Zhang, Rui Zhang, Yuwen Yang et al.· Frontiers in Cell and Develo...· 0 citations
The mechanisms of biofilm formation and current treatment strategies are outlined, with emphasis on their advantages and limitations, and advances in stimuli-responsive antibiofilm materials in orthopedics and related fields are summarized.
Han-Rong Xia, Xing-Zhou Wei, Chen-Yang Jin et al.· BME Horizon· 0 citations
It is concluded that biofilm-responsive wound nanomedicine must move beyond bacterial killing alone toward validated wound-ecosystem regulation, with stronger emphasis on mature biofilm models, polymicrobial infection, human-relevant tissue testing, long-term scar quality, and reproducible manufacturing.
Shiyu Cao, Bingran Qi, Peng-Fei Di et al.· International Journal of Nan...· 0 citations
This review surveys strategies spanning surface engineering to three-dimensional scaffolds to examine how nanoscale and hierarchical topographies on dense implants instruct protein adsorption and osteogenesis, then assess antibacterial coatings that must balance bactericidal potency with hostcell safety.
Chi Zhang, Jian-Xun Yao, Yu-Xin Huang et al.· NANO· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.