Aug 2026· JACC: Advances· Vol 5· 1 citation· 20 references
Medicine
TL;DR
In a contemporary AMI cohort, combined LLT remained low at presentation and discharge despite suboptimal LDL-C, underscoring actionable gaps in ASCVD management.
Abstract
Background Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering with lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is foundational for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate LDL-C levels and LLT at the time of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods We retrospectively assessed LDL-C levels and LLT use at presentation and discharge among patients hospitalized with AMI from March 2018 to August 2022. Results Among AMI patients with no prior ASCVD diagnosis (n = 1,159), 94.7% had LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL, 86.7% had LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL, and 33.6% were on outpatient statin therapy prior to admission. Among those not taking LLT and aged 18 to 79 years with available risk data, 89.0% met statin eligibility in the 2026 U.S. dyslpidemia guideline. Among AMI patients with prior ASCVD (n = 689), 81.0% had LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL, 64.7% had LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL, 73.7% were previously on statins, and 3.9% were on combination LLT. Although 94.0% of all AMI patients were discharged on statins (81.8% with high intensity), only 5.0% were discharged with combination LLT. Among patients with prior ASCVD and LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL, 24.9% had an increase in statin intensity, 7.2% received combination LLT, and 47.0% received no LLT intensification at discharge. Conclusions In a contemporary AMI cohort, ∼2 in 3 patients presenting with a new ASCVD diagnosis were not previously on a statin, and nearly all had LDL-C ≥55 mg/dL. Among AMI patients with known ASCVD, ∼1 in 4 were not on a statin, and ∼4 in 5 had LDL ≥55 mg/dL. Combination LLT remained low at presentation and discharge despite suboptimal LDL-C, underscoring actionable gaps in ASCVD management.
Upfront dual therapy with atorvastatin (80 mg) and ezetimibe (10 mg) achieved robust LDL‑C reduction with low interindividual variability in treatment-naive individuals, which supports current guideline recommendations for immediate combination therapy in very high-risk patients, irrespective of their baseline metaboli...
U. Makhmudova, D. Lütjohann, F. Haertel et al.· Herz· 0 citations
Targeted quality improvement initiatives are needed to address gaps in ambulatory cholesterol management in adults with CAD hospitalized for acute coronary events.
L. Colantonio, Zhi-Xin Wang, Stephen L. Sigal et al.· JACC: Advances· 0 citations
In patients with AMI despite documented prior statin exposure, the prognostic associations of residual inflammatory and Lp(a) risk appeared to differ across admission LDL-C strata, supporting the potential value of LDL-C–stratified residual risk assessment.
A substantial proportion of patients with ischemic stroke fail to achieve optimal LDL-C reduction; thus, more intensive and multifaceted lipid-lowering strategies focusing on both absolute and relative LDL-C reduction may lead to improved long-term outcomes.
M. Baik, Jimin Jeon, Joonsang Yoo et al.· Neurology· 0 citations
Although eCLE does not improve discrimination beyond age and LDL-C entered separately, it is a simple and practical metric that may be useful for risk stratification of cardiovascular events after ACS.
Naoki Serikawa, M. Yoshikawa, H. Arashi et al.· International Journal of Car...· 0 citations
Most patients at high CV risk were not optimally managed, with low rates of LLT initiation, treatment intensification, LDL-C monitoring, and LDL-C goal attainment across 11 databases, highlighting a substantial unmet clinical need for improved guideline-based lipid management to prevent first major CV events in high-ri...
Q. Chan, J. Cegla, U. Laufs et al.· Clinical Research in Cardiol...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.