This chapter explains the main types of Earth embeddings, from implicit location encoders to explicit patch and pixel products, and compares their coverage, resolution, dimensionality, storage cost, licenses, and reproducibility.
Abstract
Earth observation is moving from foundation models that users must run themselves toward embedding products that package model feature outputs as reusable data without needing to download and process the imagery used to generate them. Earth embeddings are vectors that summarize locations, image patches, or pixels, letting users analyze compact features instead of repeatedly training or running large models on raw satellite imagery. This chapter explains the main types of Earth embeddings, from implicit location encoders to explicit patch and pixel products, and compares their coverage, resolution, dimensionality, storage cost, licenses, and reproducibility. We review their use in land cover and crop mapping, ecological and hazard modeling, socioeconomic prediction, and semantic search, with evidence on when embeddings improve on conventional features and when pooling, fusion, or spatial transfer limit performance. Two case studies show practical workflows for similarity search and land cover mapping. We close with guidance for choosing, evaluating, storing, compressing, and publishing embeddings, and with open problems in oceanic and atmospheric coverage, uncertainty, and benchmarking.
This survey reviews the development of Earth embeddings from foundation model pretraining and reusable encoders to global and near-global embedding products, and summarizes the technical and scientific challenges surrounding global embedding products.
The study shows that temporal coverage is a tunable cost rather than a fixed prerequisite, opening regimes such as near-real-time mapping and faster land-use/land-cover refresh cycles.
Julia Guerrero-Viu, Alex López-Cifuentes, Ignacio Pérez-Villar et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces GeoMEB, a large-scale multimodal embedding benchmark that standardizes 45 urban evaluation tasks across retrieval, visual question answering, change detection, classification, and visual grounding, and presents Geo-Embed, a unified embedding model that adapts a shared vision-language backbone to in...
Jia-Peng Li, Yong Li, Jun-Jie Zhou et al.· 0 citations
The geographic coordinate robustness of Tessera v1, Tessera v1.1, and AlphaEarth is evaluated by testing whether coordinates can be predicted from the embedding representations using 284 quality-verified European solar farms from 2024.
The results support frozen geospatial embeddings as a low-compute candidate for regional cropland mapping, subject to the limits of a single-state study, a 30 m-derived training reference, and a one-block human validation.
Mohammad Ammar Mughees, Giovanni Montefoschi, Zhong-Xin Chen et al.· 0 citations
Off-the-shelf satellite embeddings are a promising low-cost complement to data-intensive approaches, particularly for rapid, large-scale, or repeated analyses and in settings where traditional data are limited.
Barbara Metzler, Martin Fleischmann, Dani Arribas-Bel· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.