Skip to content
Preprint

Neuro-Symbolic Proof-of-Vulnerability Generation with Open-Weight Models

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 47 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

POVGEN, a low-cost neuro-symbolic framework that makes PoV generation cost-effective via semantic focusing and LLM-guided constraint reasoning using open-weight models, and fine-tuned open-weight models match frontier commercial LLMs on key sub-tasks while running locally at no per-sample API cost.

Abstract

Software vulnerabilities are persistent, but validating them remains difficult: a Proof-of-Vulnerability (PoV) requires a concrete input that triggers the vulnerable behavior, yet public triggering inputs are often unavailable for disclosed vulnerabilities. Existing techniques make different tradeoffs in effectiveness, scalability, cost, and controllability, leaving room for complementary designs. To complement them, we present POVGEN, a low-cost neuro-symbolic framework that makes PoV generation cost-effective via semantic focusing and LLM-guided constraint reasoning using open-weight models. POVGEN first localizes vulnerability-relevant regions (utilizing patch information if available), then performs path-sensitive reachability analysis, and finally generates PoVs by extracting and solving constraints with LLM-guided reasoning backed by an SMT solver. POVGEN successfully generates PoVs for 78.98% of vulnerabilities in a recent benchmark, outperforming fuzzing (up to 50.20%) and symbolic execution (2.45%). On 250 real-world CVEs without public PoVs, it generates valid PoVs for 74.80% of cases and reproduces 65.1% when without patch information. The fine-tuned open-weight models match frontier commercial LLMs on key sub-tasks (i.e., the core constraint-reasoning steps) while running locally at no per-sample API cost. Applying the generated PoVs revealed six flawed patches in disclosed CVEs (all subsequently fixed) and five previously unreported vulnerabilities (of which four have been confirmed and fixed by the developers).

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Coverage-Driven RTL Assertion Generation with Formal Exploration and Neuro-Symbolic Refinement

NeuroAssertion is presented, a coverage-driven assertion generation framework that combines formal trace generation, syntax-guided synthesis (SyGuS), and an agent-inspired refinement process within a unified framework that delivers around 2X more assertions and about 2X higher mutation coverage than traditional asserti...

Zhi-Yuan Yan, Ziyue Zheng, Hongce Zhang · 0 citations
Jul 2026

PROGRESS: Property-Guided Regression Search for Semantic Falsification

This work presents PROGRESS (PROperty-Guided REgression Search for Semantic Falsification), integrating intent-driven properties into coverage-guided, search-based evolutionary test generation to reach deep program states and detect violations of intended behavior.

D. Mo, Noshin Ulfat, Matthew B. Dwyer et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Large Language Models as Falsifiers for Cyber-Physical Systems

LLM-Falsifier is shown to outperform existing falsification tools based on a range of optimization paradigms, from surrogate-based and Bayesian optimization to search-based testing, on 14 of 21 specifications when measured by the average number of simulations required to find a counterexample.

Ali ArjomandBigdeli, Jia-Wei Zhou, Stanley Bak · 0 citations
Sep 2026

SE4SC-LLM: an LLM-Augmented symbolic execution framework for smart contracts

SE4SC-LLM, an LLM-augmented symbolic execution framework for smart contracts that achieves 95.1% average CFG coverage, a 6.5 percentage point improvement over the strongest baseline, and detects 11.2% more vulnerabilities.

Tian-Huan Miao, Yang Liu · 0 citations
Aug 2026

HGFuzzer: Directed Greybox Fuzzing via Large Language Model

HGFuzzer, an automated framework that augments DGF with predicate-guided execution synthesis, and successfully triggered 19 bugs, unearthed 9 previously unknown, CVE-assigned bugs, confirming its efficacy in real-world security auditing.

Hanxiang Xu, Yan-Jie Zhao, Junqing Yu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.