Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary brain tumour in adults, and after treatment, it is also difficult to know whether a person’s health has improved. Pseudoprogression (PsP), particularly following radiotherapy and combination therapy with temozolomide and new immunotherapies, may be falsely identified as true progression (TP) by conventional MRI, thus leading to premature termination of treatment or unnecessary intensification of therapy. Although RANO, iRANO and RANO 2.0 have improved the assessment of response, structural MRI alone is unable to reveal the biological complexity of the tumour microenvironment. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based radiomics and radiogenomics aid in the characterisation of GBM. Several Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences are used to obtain quantitative data, such as the conventional T1-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images, perfusion-weighted images and others, to acquire information on cell density, blood vessel distribution, immune cell concentration, molecular modifications and the effect of therapy. Combine imaging characteristics with liquid biopsy, genomic data and patient health records to enhance the accuracy of diagnosis and discover high-sensitivity surrogate markers for immune checkpoint inhibitor and CAR-T cell therapy clinical trials. Clinical translation still faces numerous limitations such as inconsistent research protocols, small study cohorts, insufficient external validation, inadequate model interpretability and inconsistent reference standards. In the future, many research groups will conduct multi-centre validation, standardize workflows, open-source reporting and release clinically interpretable models. The above ways can reduce the bias induced by PsP and improve differentiation between pseudoprogression and true progression to facilitate prompt treatment for most people.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
The application of agile software methods and more recently the integration of Lean practices contribute to the trend of continuous improvement in the software industry. One such area warranting proper empirical evidence is a project’s operational efficiency when using the Kanban method. This short paper takes a new an...
Marko Ikonen, Petri Kettunen, Nilay V. Oza et al.· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 67 citations· ⚡9
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.