PAIR (Pairwise-Aware Inclusion Reweighting), which treats short rollout prefixes as vertices and pair-gradient terms as edges of a contrast graph, and is introduced, which treats short rollout prefixes as vertices and pair-gradient terms as edges of a contrast graph.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) spends most of its compute generating groups of long reasoning trajectories. Recent allocators reduce this cost by assigning budgets to prompts, rollouts, or tokens according to a pointwise notion of difficulty or utility. We identify a statistical mismatch: the unclipped leave-one-out group-relative score gradient is not a sum of independent point contributions, but a second-order U-statistic over pairs of rollouts. Completing one rollout therefore reveals contrast with every other completed rollout, and adaptive endpoint selection changes which pair terms are observable. We introduce PAIR (Pairwise-Aware Inclusion Reweighting), which treats short rollout prefixes as vertices and pair-gradient terms as edges of a contrast graph. A prefix-only predictor estimates correctness and remaining token cost; a convex design chooses positive continuation probabilities under an expected suffix-token budget; and each edge induced by completed vertices is inverse-weighted by its logged joint inclusion probability. Under conditionally independent on-policy rollouts and an unclipped, unstandardized objective, the resulting estimator is design-unbiased for the complete candidate-pair gradient. Across compute-matched RLVR runs on Qwen3-1.7B/4B, PAIR improves average accuracy by +1.2 and +1.4 over the strongest pointwise allocator while using 51% and 52% fewer generated tokens than full-group GRPO. A frozen-population estimator audit confirms that unweighted adaptive selection is biased, whereas pair-inclusion correction recovers the complete-pair target at matched suffix cost.
I-SDPO (Instance-Level Adaptive Self-Distillation Policy Optimization), which treats teacher reliance as capability-dependent and uses imitation only where group-relative rewards are uninformative, obtains the best result in all four scientific domains.
Yubo Zhang, Xin-Hong Ma, Zezhong Tan et al.· 1 citation
Cue-GRPO improves AIME repeated-sampling performance and introduces a partition- conditioned rule that redistributes positive advantages accord- ing to cluster rarity, with Strategy Cues providing a low-overhead implementation for competition mathematics.
SignBALANCE is proposed, whose magnitude is composition-free: it keeps the verifier sign, uses a global scale, and restores zero-mean balance via a stop-gradient per-class rescaling.
Jiamian Wang, Samyadeep Basu, Koustava Goswami et al.· 0 citations
The prior requires no target-policy rollout before the first selection, but the posterior thereafter uses target-policy outcomes, and the measured ThinkPrior+DAPO composition reduces generated rollouts by 10.6% while both arms retain the same 3840-rollout update budget.
Tommy Sha, Skylar Zhai, Si-Qi Zhao· 1 citation· ⚡1
It is shown that on-policy reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can improve the current objective while making successful behaviors for later objectives too rare to sample and reinforce, and effective rewardable support is defined as successful trajectories reachable within a fixed rollout budget.
Shaohang Wei, Z.Y. Su, Feifan Song et al.· 0 citations
Experiments on WebShop and ALFWorld with different backbones show that TRIAL outperforms GRPO across all eight combinations of backbone, environment, and evaluation metric, while achieving the best or tied-best performance among six methods on six of them.
Hao-Yu Zheng, Yun Zhu, Qing Wang et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.