May 2025· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2505.22451· 7 citations
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work proposes AI Mathematician (AIM) framework, which harnesses the reasoning strength of LRMs to support frontier mathematical research and highlights the potential of LRMs in mathematical discovery and suggests that LRM-based agent systems could significantly accelerate mathematical research in the future.
Abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have made significant progress in mathematical capabilities in recent times. However, these successes have been primarily confined to competition-level problems. In this work, we propose AI Mathematician (
Aim
framework, which harnesses the reasoning strength of LRMs to support frontier mathematical research. We have identified two critical challenges of mathematical research compared to competition, the intrinsic complexity of research problems and the requirement of procedural rigor. To address these challenges,
Aim
incorporates two core strategies: an exploration mechanism to foster longer solution paths, and the pessimistic reasonable verification method to ensure reliability. This early version of
Aim
already exhibits strong capability in tackling research-level tasks. We conducted extensive experiments across several real-world mathematical topics and obtained promising results.
Aim
is able to autonomously construct substantial portions of proofs and uncover non-trivial insights within each research area. These findings highlight the potential of LRMs in mathematical discovery and suggest that LRM-based agent systems could significantly accelerate mathematical research in the future.
Stellar Colosseum is introduced, a model-agnostic harness for allocating inference across research in mathematics and theoretical computer science that demonstrates the capabilities of Colosseum through open-ended research and evaluations on theorem-proving and competitive programming benchmarks.
Hong-Hao Lin, David P. Woodruff, Yuan Deng et al.· 2 citations· ⚡1
The introduction of ScientistTwo, a fully autonomous multi-agent framework designed to realize problem-driven autonomous research, and its results show that ScientistTwo is not merely an assistive tool but an autonomous scientific pioneer capable of pushing the frontiers of human discovery.
Jaehyun Nam, Jinsung Yoon, Yan Pan et al.· Robotics· 0 citations
This study compares public AI research accounts with the human literature on 11 such problems and reveals two distinct research profiles: AI accounts concentrate on closing and recombining problems, whereas mathematical papers more extensively document the procedures, limits, and research opportunities through which re...
Experiments reveal that models with similar end-to-end accuracy can exhibit markedly different agentic capability profiles, demonstrating that process-level evaluation is crucial for interpreting the true potential of LLMs and guiding the development of next-generation mathematical agents.
Jiayi Kuang, Ying-Hui Li, Yun-Ze Song et al.· 0 citations
Using frontier agent harnesses to tackle mathematical research problems has emerged as an effective means of advancing mathematics. However, solving frontier problems in mathematics may require a massive number of agents working in parallel for extended periods to construct proofs, thereby generating an enormous volume...
Jun-Yi Zhang, Jin-Xi Yu, E. Jiang et al.· 0 citations
Fair Multi-Level Preference Optimization (Fair-MPO or $\Phi$-MPO), a new preference optimization framework for agentic learning, is proposed and a Fair Multi-Level Objective that addresses imbalance in agentic learning is introduced.
Thanh-Dat Truong, Sankalp Pandey, Hugh Churchill et al.· 0 citations