A three-regime batch-size phase diagram that reveals how the role of momentum changes with batch size is revealed, with Polyak enlarging the critical batch size, the largest batch size preserving the best small-batch data-scaling exponent, thereby enabling greater parallelism without sacrificing data efficiency.
Abstract
We study when and how momentum improves large-batch training in the one-pass regime, using power-law kernel regression as a tractable setting. We first characterize risk stability through the critical learning rate, defined as the largest learning rate for stable training, and obtain $\eta_{\mathrm{SGD}}^{\mathrm{crit}}\eqsim 1$, $\eta_{\mathrm{Polyak}}^{\mathrm{crit}}\eqsim \min\{1,B(1-\rho)\}$, and $\eta_{\mathrm{Nesterov}}^{\mathrm{crit}}\eqsim \min\{1,B^\beta(1-\rho)\}$, where $B$ is the batch size, $\rho$ is the momentum factor, and $\beta>1$ is the capacity exponent. Within this admissible region, we derive scaling laws for the full risk dynamics, capturing the progression from an early transient, through power-law decay, to a noise floor. We then minimize the final-step risk over the admissible learning rates and momentum factors under a fixed data budget, yielding a three-regime batch-size phase diagram that reveals how the role of momentum changes with batch size. Notably, Polyak enlarges the critical batch size, the largest batch size preserving the best small-batch data-scaling exponent, thereby enabling greater parallelism without sacrificing data efficiency. In contrast, Nesterov achieves better data efficiency in the large-batch regime because its look-ahead mechanism suppresses noise accumulation. Numerical experiments validate the predicted stability boundaries, risk dynamics, and batch-size phase diagram.
We study finite-sample parameter estimation in logistic regression with Gaussian design, where the goal is to estimate $\mathbf{\theta}^*\in \mathbb{R}^d$ with $R=\|\mathbf{\theta}^*\|_2\ge 1$ from i.i.d. samples $\{(\mathbf{x}_i,y_i)\}_{i=1}^n,$ $\mathbf{x}_i \sim N(0,\mathbf{I}_d)$, $y_i\mid \mathbf{x}_i \sim \mathrm...
This analysis reveals a scale-sensitive interaction between the statistical estimation of classification error and its amplification by robustness, sharply explaining the transition in the agnostic rate.
Elad Aigner-Horev, Daniel Rosenberg, Roi Weiss· 1 citation· ⚡1
Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension $d_N$ and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension $d_{DS}$, the optimal excess risk...
Xiao-Yu Li, Andi Han, Jiao-Jiao Jiang et al.· 1 citation
Bernard CVaR-UCBVI is minimax-optimal over the full return-law class in the leading-order regime; the lower-order terms retain their $\tau^{-1}$ dependence.
This work improves the upper bound to match the best known lower bound, thus establishing the optimal error guarantee for learning under Tsybakov noise.
Steve Hanneke, Hongao Wang, Mingyue Xu· 0 citations
Together with the silver-schedule upper bound and the anytime upper bound, the results determine the optimal polynomial convergence exponents in both settings.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.