Skip to content

GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models

Dec 2023 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2312.06315 · 23 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes a bias evaluation framework named GPTBIAS that leverages the high performance of LLMs (e.g., GPT-4 \cite{openai2023gpt4}) to assess bias in models and introduces prompts specifically designed for evaluating model bias.

Abstract

Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or upsetting. There has been a significant increase in the usage of large language models (LLMs) in various applications, both in their original form and through fine-tuned adaptations. As a result, LLMs have gained popularity and are being widely adopted by a large user community. However, one of the concerns with LLMs is the potential generation of socially biased content. The existing evaluation methods have many constraints, and their results exhibit a limited degree of interpretability. In this work, we propose a bias evaluation framework named GPTBIAS that leverages the high performance of LLMs (e.g., GPT-4 \cite{openai2023gpt4}) to assess bias in models. We also introduce prompts called Bias Attack Instructions, which are specifically designed for evaluating model bias. To enhance the credibility and interpretability of bias evaluation, our framework not only provides a bias score but also offers detailed information, including bias types, affected demographics, keywords, reasons behind the biases, and suggestions for improvement. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness and usability of our bias evaluation framework.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

LLJ Cards: Best practices for the Use of LLMs as Judges

LLJ Cards is introduced, a framework that synthesizes best practices from measurement theory, natural language generation, and machine learning literature into practical guidelines for LLJ-based evaluations and provides a structured framework for applying these principles in the design and reporting of automated evalua...

Khaoula Chehbouni, Melina Medjdoub, Florian Carichon et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Population Fidelity: Evaluating Population Representativeness in LLMs

This work introduces Population Fidelity, an evaluation framework that distinguishes key conditions required for a set of LLM-generated responses to represent a population and organizes these features and provides reusable code, data, and trained models for evaluating population fidelity across substantive domains and...

Neemias B. da Silva, Martin Lukk, A. Sutani et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Total Simulated Survey Error: Designing and Diagnosing Survey Responses from Large Language Models

A framework that enumerates conceptual errors and systematic biases that can occur at different stages of the survey simulation lifecycle is designed, called the Total Simulated Survey Error (TS2E) Framework, which provides a unified and end-to-end perspective on LLM-generated survey data.

Indira Sen, Georg Ahnert, Leah von der Heyde et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

A Fairness–Utility Evaluation Framework for Assessing Large Language Models (LLMs)

Large language models are increasingly used in contexts where their outputs can affect people directly, including hiring, admissions, and lending. This growing role makes it important to consider not only how well these models perform, but also whether their behavior is fair. Although many fairness metrics, bias benchm...

Samah Alhazmi · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Subjective Multi-Bias Detection with Large Language Models

This project delved into the pervasive challenge of bias detection within the text content by detecting three different types of multi-span biases in corpus WIKIBIAS with more than 4,000 sentence pairs from Wikipedia edits.

Rui-Yu Li, Zhi-Ying Zhu · 0 citations
Aug 2026

How prompts manipulate models: measuring cognitive bias vulnerability in commercial LLMs across languages

It is observed that bias vulnerability increases in Hindi and Bengali compared to English, particularly under manipulative prompts, which highlights the importance of multilingual bias evaluation and provides practical guidance for selecting commercial language models in bias-sensitive applications.

Koushik Deb, Imon Mukherjee, Debarshi Kumar Sanyal · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.