Skip to content

Beyond Textual Chain-of-Thought: A Survey on Action-Grounded Reasoning in Autonomous Driving

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 121 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This synthesis shows that the open frontier of reasoning in driving agents lies in intermediate representations that can be grounded in the real world, coupled to real-time action, and verified under safety-critical systems.

Abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning powers generative models by eliciting intermediate steps before producing an answer. In autonomous driving, the answer is a continuous action. Thus its reasoning must share the same spatiotemporal structure as the physical world. This survey studies the resulting shift from textual CoT to action-grounded reasoning. Surveying 171 papers, including 130 method papers and 41 benchmarks, datasets, surveys, and analysis papers, we propose a representation-centered taxonomy that treats the form of the intermediate state as the organizing axis. We systematize the 130 methods into four categories: language-based, visual-spatial, latent-dynamic, and externalized reasoning, further divided into 13 subtypes tied to distinct regions of interests. Our synthesis shows that the open frontier of reasoning in driving agents lies in intermediate representations that can be grounded in the real world, coupled to real-time action, and verified under safety-critical systems. Project page: https://github.com/tangzhengxu/awesome-av-cot.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Where Do Embodied Decisions Come From? Rethinking Latent and Explicit Reasoning

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is increasingly incorporated into Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, yet it can degrade the performance of stronger embodied agents. We investigate this capability-dependent effect by distinguishing explicit reasoning from latent decision computation, i.e., perception-grounded computa...

Yuan-Peng Lin, Zi-Yu Zhou, Jin-Long Zhao et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

CausalDriveBench: Evaluating Causal Reasoning in Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving produce natural-language reasoning alongside predicted trajectories, but whether this reasoning reflects the causal structure of the scene remains untested. We introduce CausalDriveBench, an evaluation framework grounded in Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (PCH) that t...

Narendiran Chembu, Navvrat Rao, S. Kodate et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

GRAVA: Grounded Reasoning-to-Action Representation and Learning for Autonomous Driving

GRAVA-8B achieves state-of-the-art performance among purely autoregressive driving models on the full NAVSIM benchmark, and results show the benefit of preserving action-relevant physical evidence from grounded reasoning through executable action generation.

Xiao Liu, Hao-Yu Li, Jiang-Hao Leng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Grounding What Shapes the Plan: Rethinking Groundedness for Physical Intelligence in Autonomous Driving

Driving models increasingly ground reasoning in causal relations, spatial structure, perceptual evidence, and predicted futures. These advances make reasoning more faithful to the driving scene, but leave a fundamental question unresolved: what should groundedness mean when the model ultimately outputs an action? Corre...

Minkyoung Cho, Ze-Wei Zhou, Wen-Hao Ding et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

CASCADE: A Spatio-Temporal-Causal Reasoning Representation and Dataset for Driving

This work introduces CASCADE (Causal Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Driving Environments), a structured scene representation for reasoning in driving scenes and a human-annotated dataset built on it that provides the reference for benchmarking the reasoning abilities of Physical AI models, and verifying the quality of aut...

Jenny Schmalfuss, Despoina Paschalidou, Simon Gerstenecker et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.