This synthesis shows that the open frontier of reasoning in driving agents lies in intermediate representations that can be grounded in the real world, coupled to real-time action, and verified under safety-critical systems.
Abstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning powers generative models by eliciting intermediate steps before producing an answer. In autonomous driving, the answer is a continuous action. Thus its reasoning must share the same spatiotemporal structure as the physical world. This survey studies the resulting shift from textual CoT to action-grounded reasoning. Surveying 171 papers, including 130 method papers and 41 benchmarks, datasets, surveys, and analysis papers, we propose a representation-centered taxonomy that treats the form of the intermediate state as the organizing axis. We systematize the 130 methods into four categories: language-based, visual-spatial, latent-dynamic, and externalized reasoning, further divided into 13 subtypes tied to distinct regions of interests. Our synthesis shows that the open frontier of reasoning in driving agents lies in intermediate representations that can be grounded in the real world, coupled to real-time action, and verified under safety-critical systems. Project page: https://github.com/tangzhengxu/awesome-av-cot.
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is increasingly incorporated into Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, yet it can degrade the performance of stronger embodied agents. We investigate this capability-dependent effect by distinguishing explicit reasoning from latent decision computation, i.e., perception-grounded computa...
Yuan-Peng Lin, Zi-Yu Zhou, Jin-Long Zhao et al.· 0 citations
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving produce natural-language reasoning alongside predicted trajectories, but whether this reasoning reflects the causal structure of the scene remains untested. We introduce CausalDriveBench, an evaluation framework grounded in Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (PCH) that t...
Narendiran Chembu, Navvrat Rao, S. Kodate et al.· 0 citations
GRAVA-8B achieves state-of-the-art performance among purely autoregressive driving models on the full NAVSIM benchmark, and results show the benefit of preserving action-relevant physical evidence from grounded reasoning through executable action generation.
Xiao Liu, Hao-Yu Li, Jiang-Hao Leng et al.· 0 citations
Driving models increasingly ground reasoning in causal relations, spatial structure, perceptual evidence, and predicted futures. These advances make reasoning more faithful to the driving scene, but leave a fundamental question unresolved: what should groundedness mean when the model ultimately outputs an action? Corre...
Minkyoung Cho, Ze-Wei Zhou, Wen-Hao Ding et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces CASCADE (Causal Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Driving Environments), a structured scene representation for reasoning in driving scenes and a human-annotated dataset built on it that provides the reference for benchmarking the reasoning abilities of Physical AI models, and verifying the quality of aut...
Jenny Schmalfuss, Despoina Paschalidou, Simon Gerstenecker et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes CaRGo-T (Causal Reasoning Graph-of-Thought), a reasoning framework that represents the causal and contextual relationships underlying multimodal humor as a lightweight graph-based reasoning structure.
Abhilash Nandy, Rahul Seetharaman, Aman Bansal et al.· 0 citations
To help robots do chores in places like homes and factories, a new approach from MIT uses one language model to clarify users’ instructions, then another to ignore irrelevant info.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.