Skip to content

LLM Watermarking as Big Data Provenance: A Deployment-Oriented Systematization

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 92 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper systematizes LLM watermarking as provenance infrastructure for large-scale data ecosystems and introduces a Big Data Watermarking Readiness framework centered on four deployment workloads: online generation, streaming detection, transformation pipelines, and ecosystem governance.

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) become widely deployed, their outputs can be copied, transformed, and redistributed at scale without reliable evidence of origin, creating risks for trust, accountability, intellectual property (IP) protection, and high-stakes decision-making. LLM watermarking addresses this problem by embedding detectable signals into text during or after generation. However, existing methods vary in design assumptions, threat models, and evaluation criteria, while deployment choices such as watermark placement, detection authority, and key management affect reliability, security, and scalability. This paper systematizes LLM watermarking as provenance infrastructure for large-scale data ecosystems. We organize existing approaches along four deployment dimensions: insertion point, verification authority, operational state, and transformation threat model, and relate them to the big data requirements of Volume, Velocity, Variety, Veracity, and Value. We further introduce a Big Data Watermarking Readiness framework centered on four deployment workloads: online generation, streaming detection, transformation pipelines, and ecosystem governance. The framework connects these workloads to system-level requirements including throughput, false-positive control, robustness, cross-domain reliability, governance, and downstream utility. Our analysis highlights a gap between benchmark performance and deployment readiness: false positives accumulate at scale, repeated transformations weaken watermark signals, computational overhead can limit online deployment, and centralized verification can create governance bottlenecks. We conclude with an evaluation blueprint and research directions for scalable, trustworthy provenance in big data ecosystems.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Tracing Provenance and Detecting Tampering with Complementary LLM Watermarks

Watermarking LLM-generated text is an important task for tracing its provenance. Existing LLM watermarks preserve provenance under editing, but this same robustness allows an adversary to alter critical content while retaining attribution, a vulnerability known as piggyback spoofing. We introduce an innovative watermar...

Xiao-Yang Feng, Yanjun Zhang, He Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Keyed Provenance Watermarking with Complementary Lattice-Based Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning

Federated learning (FL) is vulnerable to multi-level attacks. However, existing methods address them separately, leaving FL exposed to data leakage, unauthorized reuse, and malicious gradient manipulation. In this work, we propose an FL framework that couples keyed context-provenance watermarking with verifiable lattic...

Xin-Yun Liu, Zhi Lu, Yu Chen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Encrypted-Traffic Detection in the TLS 1.3 Era: A Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions

The synthesis identifies behavioural–statistical fusion as a promising research direction; however, its effectiveness remains empirically unvalidated as an integrated framework and future research should prioritise reproducible datasets, cross-environment and adversarial evaluation, and lightweight, interpretable detec...

Hazem Abu-Adaiq, Mahesh Biswas, Ahmad Y. Alnajjar et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

WoE Wrote It? Watermarking Mixture-of-Experts LLMs for Black-Box Text Provenance

WoE remains detectable under adversarial supervised fine-tuning, model extraction, and output-level paraphrasing, forcing malicious actors into a trade-off in which weakening the attribution signal requires additional model adaptation or text-rewriting operations, or compromises the utility of the resulting output.

Jona te Lintelo, Li-Chao Wu, S. Picek · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Privacy-Preserving Middleware Architecture for Detecting Prompt Injection and Sensitive Data Exposure in Large-Language-Model Interactions

A privacy-preserving hybrid middleware architecture that enforces a local trust boundary as its primary design constraint that is model-agnostic, requires no retraining of the underlying LLM, and is compatible with black-box API deployments is proposed and evaluated.

Adam Ait Hsine, A. Arabo · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

The Shape of Ownership: Verifying LLM Provenance through Semantic Structures

This work introduces PROSE (Provenance through Relational Organization of Semantic Expression), replacing fixed query sets with a target semantical domain and brittle response keys with semantic structures internalized as domain-conditioned response behavior.

Zhong-Rui Sun, Jia-Hao Chen, Ou-Bo Ma et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Nov 3, 2026

Learn the rules: The hacker mindset

Research Manager Mike Walker reflects on a career spanning hacker culture, cybersecurity, and AI, sharing lessons about trust, teamwork, leadership, and why solving difficult problems requires curiosity, judgment, agility—and an understanding of the rules. The post Learn the rules: The hacker mindset appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.