Skip to content

The PIONEER Project: A PrIvacy companion for mOtivatioN and knowlEdge transfER

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 12 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The PIONEER project reports on the progress made by the PIONEER project on a privacy support tool that combines knowledge transfer and persuasive elements to increase users' privacy awareness and motivation; thus empowering them to more privacy sovereignty.

Abstract

Remaining control over their private data is one of the key challenges in this century for users. We know from prior work that users are often neither in a position to fully grasp the content of the usually complicated texts, nor are they motivated to spend the time necessary to do so. We report on the progress made by the PIONEER project on a privacy support tool that combines knowledge transfer and persuasive elements to increase users'privacy awareness and motivation; thus empowering them to more privacy sovereignty. Throughout the research and design process, we consider user group specifics that may result in different requirements, e.g., for children, adolescents, parents, or elderly people. We further target sustainable behavior change by addressing different states of change, precisely: spark initial motivation, facilitate the creation of new habits, and encourage habituation of these habits in the long term (volition). Finally, we provide a privacy support tool demonstrator that can be utilized for research and education purposes, e.g., in school contexts.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

SoK: From Generation to Consumption of Privacy Documents in Software Systems

A unified, lifecycle-oriented view of privacy documents from a software engineering perspective is provided, organizing them around five research questions that examine how privacy documents are created, analyzed, evaluated, and maintained across their lifecycle.

Shi-Dong Pan, Clark LaChance, Zhen-Yuan Tao et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Towards a Platform for Mastering Personal Sovereignty

The ongoing digital transformation of work, administration, health, mobility, and social interaction is profoundly reshaping everyday life, steadily shifting control from individuals to large platform providers. Although data is often labeled the"gold of the 21st century", its real value is realized through services th...

Judith Michael, B. Rumpe, Antonio Bucchiarone et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

E-proctoring perspectives: A Student-Instructor Comparative Analysis through the Lens of Networked Privacy

Most academic institutions have returned to primarily in-person instruction, but e-proctoring software remains a convenient and resource-efficient option to remotely administer and monitor online examinations, despite questions about its effectiveness. Our paper reports on semi-structured interviews with 33 individuals...

Kazma Chaudhry, Hala Assal, Sonia Chiasson · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Privacy, Culture, and Information Disclosure. A Configurational Analysis of the Role of Uncertainty Avoidance and Individualism

The use of mobility services has increased the volume of data that consumers share with organizations. Despite consumers being aware of the risks they assume when sharing their personal information, they continue to do so through a process explained by the privacy paradox. The explanation for this behavior can be fou...

Cayetano Medina-Molina, Manuel Rey-Moreno, N. Pérez-Macías · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Context, Not Paradox: How Do Users Protect Their Privacy in the Digital World?

The article focuses on the importance of context in the decision-making process regarding privacy on the Internet. Previous analyses have primarily been based on the concepts of the privacy paradox, privacy cynicism, and privacy self-management, which explain in different ways the tension between individuals declared a...

Julia Heller · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Perceived Responsibility and Capability for Smart Speaker Privacy Controls: A Cross-National Study in Germany and the UK

Smart speakers are popular assistants but require constant processing of voice data, thus, posing threats to users’ and bystanders’ privacy. While different privacy controls are available it is unknown who people perceive as responsible at the three stages conceptualization, implementation, and activation. Answering th...

Patrick Kühtreiber, Delphine Reinhardt, Hauke Bock et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Reinforcing the value of human understanding at MIT

During the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences’ 75th Anniversary Symposium, President Sally Kornbluth said “MIT has never needed your particular insight and guidance more than we do now.”

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.