This work proposes an algorithm, TOFU-POV, that estimates the latent action subspace using the masked actions, imputes current actions using an epoch-wise frozen representation, and runs OFUL in the resulting low-dimensional coordinates, and devise a rank-adaptive algorithm that does not require the knowledge of the intrinsic dimension.
Abstract
The stochastic linear bandit, where actions are represented as vectors and rewards are linear, is a central paradigm for sequential decision making. We study a partially observed variant of this problem in which the learning agent only sees a random subset of coordinates for each action. Such partial observability arises naturally in settings like recommendation and healthcare, where full action descriptions can be expensive or even impossible to obtain. In general, this makes sublinear regret information-theoretically impossible. However, we show that this barrier can be overcome when the action vectors have low intrinsic dimension. We propose an algorithm, TOFU-POV, that estimates the latent action subspace using the masked actions, imputes current actions using an epoch-wise frozen representation, and runs OFUL in the resulting low-dimensional coordinates. Our theory shows that TOFU-POV enjoys a $\sqrt{T}$ regret that scales with the intrinsic action subspace dimension as opposed to the ambient dimension and quantifies the interaction between these quantities and the missingness, decision set size, and subspace conditioning. We also devise a rank-adaptive algorithm that does not require the knowledge of the intrinsic dimension. We complement these guarantees with a lower bound based on a novel product construction that separates usual reward-learning uncertainty from a missingness-dependent cost intrinsic to partial observation. Synthetic and real data experiments support our theory and show that TOFU-POV can substantially improve upon natural baselines in this challenging problem.
The results provide a modular framework that can be used to analyze linear bandit algorithms and explicitly connect quality of parameter estimation to optimal regret accumulation.
Arda Güçlü, Subhonmesh Bose, J. Birge· 0 citations
This work proves a regret bound of order $\tilde{O}(\sqrt T)$, significantly improving over the previous $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ guarantee, and is the first $\tilde{O}(\sqrt T)$ regret guarantee for latent linear-dynamics bandits with bilinear reward observations and an open-loop action-sequence benchmark.
Taehyun Hwang, Hyunjun Choi, Heesang Ann et al.· 0 citations
Pairwise losses are increasingly used for reward learning even when pointwise rewards are observed, with mixed empirical results. When and why do pairwise losses outperform pointwise losses? We study this question in a grouped offline contextual-bandit setting allowing multiple actions per context, capturing many rewar...
Junghyun Lee, Minsoo Ha, Sanghwa Kim et al.· 0 citations
Sequential recommenders typically use a fixed slate size even though the number of useful alternatives changes within a session. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Calibrated Pruning (RLCP), which adapts the retained action set using critic scores and an online threshold. The threshold is updated from binary feedba...
We study online inverse linear optimization with a fixed unknown linear utility: in each round, an environment presents a compact action set, the learner recommends an action from it, and the environment returns an action that maximizes the utility over the same set. When the utility vector and the actions lie in the $...
Posterior sampling for reinforcement learning (PSRL) is one of the simplest and most effective exploration methods, but a basic question has remained open: does unmodified PSRL achieve minimax regret without structural assumptions on the prior? We answer yes. Exact vanilla PSRL is minimax optimal in leading-order Bayes...
T. Goo, Kihyuk Hong· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.