BRUCE: Benchmarking Robustness Under Corruption Escalation for Scientific Vision-Language Reasoning
TL;DR
This paper proposes BRUCE (Benchmarking Robustness Under Corruption Escalation), a multimodal reasoning fragility framework for scientific vision-language reasoning that evaluates VLMs'robustness by applying perturbations and distortions to the input images, such as blur or low contrast.
Abstract
Visual-language models (VLMs) frequently struggle with robustness issues in real-world situations due to low- or varying-quality input images. In this paper, we aim at analyzing VLMs'robustness by applying perturbations and distortions to the input images, such as blur or low contrast. Toward this goal, we propose BRUCE (Benchmarking Robustness Under Corruption Escalation), a multimodal reasoning fragility framework for scientific vision-language reasoning. State-of-the-art evaluation frameworks/studies primarily focus on clean-task accuracy and rarely analyze how reasoning stability degrades across robustness dimensions. Besides varying over a wide-range of input perturbations, BRUCE employs two novel metrics -- Robustness Corruption Index (RCI) and Traversal-RCI (T-RCI) -- to quantify how rapidly multimodal reasoning performance deteriorates in VLMs as visual corruption severity increases under progressive perturbation scaling. We evaluate BRUCE across chemistry and mathematical reasoning tasks for multiple datasets, while analyzing corruption-induced prediction failures in terms of four high-level reasoning domains: OCR-dependent reasoning, spatial reasoning, symbolic reasoning, and semantic failures, with each containing fine-grained corruption specific failure subtypes, thereby enabling an interpretable failure analysis.